Japan Releases Stiff Qualifying Standards For The 2020 Home Olympic Games

The Japanese Swimming Federation has just released the selection criteria for the 2020 Summer Olympic Games set to be hosted in Tokyo and the qualifying times are indeed tough.

As with the 2016 Olympic qualifying standards, the federation incorporated what it took to final in the previous year’s World Championships (2019) when determining its Olympic minimum time requirements, which means the standards are truly meant to select those Japanese swimmers most likely to final in each event, as opposed to just representing the nation by getting up on the blocks in the Olympics.

Exceptions to the aforementioned practice are the women’s 200m fly and 400m IM events, which saw the FINA A cut used as the QT as opposed to the time needed to make the top 8 in Gwangju. This is because just 4:38.93 was needed to final in the women’s 400m IM at this year’s World Championships, while a time of 2:09.06 made it into the women’s 200m fly final. Both of those marks are slower than the respective FINA A time standards for the Olympics of 4:38.53 and 2:08.43.

As with 2016, there is one sole qualifying meet for swimmers to obtain these cuts, which is represented by the Japan Swim scheduled for April next year. The top 2 swimmers achieving, at minimum, the ‘dispatch II’ standard seen below (3rd column are men’s times; 6th column are women’s times) will be considered for selection.

Reviewing the time minimums set forth below, there are a few especially challenging marks for the Japanese swimmers. For instance, the QT of 7:48.12 in the men’s 800m free is quicker than the long-standing Japanese National Record of 7:49.65 Olympian Takeshi Matsuda put on the books way back in 2009.

Also, the men’s 50m free time standard of 21.77 sits just .10 away from Shinri Shioura‘s National Record time of 21.67 notched at the Japan Swim in April of this year. Further, the 200m free QT of 1:45.76 is positioned just .54 outside the 1:45.22 Katsuhiro Matsumoto put up for silver at this year’s World Championships.

For the women, in Rikako Ikee‘s absence, the sprint free events may potentially pose a risk of non-individual qualifiers. Only 3 Japanese women have ever broken the 25-second barrier in the 50m freestyle, with Ikee holding the NR at 24.21 and Miki Uchida nailing 24.95 back in 2015. Rika Omoto is an up-and-comer who has made some waves, but her 24.97 career-fastest from this year still sits over half a second away from the 24.46 QT.

The 100m free is potentially even more of a challenge, with the Japanese Federation-mandated qualifying time of 53.31 a tall order for the nation that has only ever seen 2 swimmers enter sub-54 second territory in the event. One again, Ikee holds the national standard in the women’s 100m free at 53.03, while Uchida swam as fast as 53.88 in her career.

The nation does hold promise in the likes of Omoto, Aya Sato, Tomomi Aoki, and Rio Shirai, however, with each of these young sprinters stepping up as of late. Although the top time among the group is 54.18, which entails a huge leap to the 53.31 QT, all have put up their career-quickest in 2019 as a good indicator of their trajectory.

As a reminder, Daiya Seto has already qualified for the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games in both the 200m IM and 400m IM by nature of his gold medals in Gwangju at the World Championships. As reported, any Japanese swimmer who collected individual gold at Worlds earned automatic qualification in the same event at the Olympic Games.

However, Seto is still required to compete at next year’s Japan Swim, where he’ll most likely also contest the 200m fly to attempt qualification. The QT of 1:56.25 is a feat Seto should easily obtain, having already taken bronze in Gwangju in a scorching 1:53.86.

As for relays, the Japanese women’s 4x100m freestyle squad finished 7th in Gwangju, while the medley relay placed 6th, both of which dipped under the QT listed below. With a top 10 finish at Worlds, these two relays should appear in Tokyo.

However, even though the women’s 4x200m free relay indeed placed 8th in Gwangju, the time of 7:56.31 was well off the 7:52.50 QT listed below. We’ll have to see what the Japanese Federation does in terms of qualification should the women still not hit the mark with collective individual efforts next April.

For the men, the medley relay came in 4th at this year’s World Championships, while the 4x100m free relay finished 9th. Both relays finished in the top 10 and also within the Japanese QT below. The 4x200m free relay, however, falls into the same boat as the women, with the 9th placed squad’s time of 7:09.23 falling short of the 7:08.31 QT.

In This Story

Leave a Reply

Notify of
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2 years ago

Is there any concept of a “wild card”? If Ikee was able to compete, but either not at Japanese trials or (understandably) wasn’t able to be back to her best at trials, is there a way they could grant her a discretionary spot? Getting ahead of myself, I know, and hopefully she’ll be back and healthy by then.

Reply to  Swimmer
2 years ago

There were no updates on her health conditions for long time already. Getting healthy could be her highest priority. And the Sport could be the last thing she is thinking about.

Coach Mike 1952
Reply to  Yozhik
2 years ago

You know, though, once a swimmer – always a swimmer. I just bet not a day goes by she isn’t thinking about swimming, despite her health challenge right now.

Reply to  Coach Mike 1952
6 months ago

1 year later— you’re right. Ikee qualifies for the Tokyo Olympics in the 100fly, maybe more to come!

Last edited 6 months ago by Charlie
2 years ago

Imagine having a qualifying time faster than a national record… Roughly equivalent to having to go faster than 46.9 to make the team for USA’s mens 1 free

Reply to  Tupperware
2 years ago

Yeah, I think you’ve got to have at least one swimmer in each event if you’re the host nation. Japan is a deep enough swimming nation that they’d still represent themselves well if they went to a “top 2” system (in most events, anyway). Plus, I think the motivation is stronger (and less intimidating) if your target is “beat this person” rather than “make a certain number appear on the scoreboard, ” so I’d bet the results would be better.

2 years ago

I’ll never really get the reason for such crazy Olympic qualifying times

Reply to  Klorn8d
2 years ago

Especially for a home games!

Reply to  Klorn8d
2 years ago

So dumb for a home Games… bad for athletes and really bad for the crowd and for atmosphere. Japan is spending billions and billions on these Games, people expect to be able to see Japanese athletes in action. That’s not unreasonable.

Reply to  Klorn8d
2 years ago

the olympics, best of the best of the sport, there are other competitions for weak ones.

2 years ago

“You know what would be great, Mr. JSF President?”
“What’s that, Dōshi?”
“If we made the qualifying times so hard that we only have 10 swimmers at our home Games”
“Say no more”
-a loose translation

2 years ago

Those are stupid

2 years ago

I wonder if we’ll see Great Britain go down the route of stiff qualifications as well.

Reply to  Jeff
2 years ago

France is in the same boat since their best retired …weird

Reply to  Jeff
2 years ago

Excessively stiff qualification times.

Actual qualification is then up to the coaches, incredibly fair and transparent.

2 years ago

Imagine qualifying a relay for the Olympics and not swimming it because you wanted “tougher standards.” What a joke.

2 years ago

This makes perfect sense if you want your swimmers to peak at trials instead of the Olympics.

Reply to  Hank
2 years ago

There’s really no reason they can’t peak for both if Trials are in April.

About Retta Race

Retta Race

Swim analyst, businesswoman.

Read More »