Men’s NCAAs Day 4 Scoring Analysis: Texas the Top Final Day Scorer To Take The Title

by Sam Blacker 21

March 28th, 2026 College, News

2026 NCAA DIVISION I MEN’S SWIMMING AND DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS

“Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.”

With the final day wrapped up, Texas are the Men’s NCAA Swimming & Diving champions for the second year in a row, claiming the title by 29.5 points over a Florida squad who made the battle far closer than we expected, in no small part due to 58 points on the boards. Texas were +2 today, rebounding from being -37 yesterday, and kept the Gators at arm’s length.

Indiana stayed ahead of ASU for 3rd, with the Sun Devils finishing two places lower than their projection. With Indiana scoring only 4 points in diving, this was a victory for the Hoosiers made in the pool, as they were +27 today and finished 23 points ahead of ASU.

Tennessee kept hold of 5th, with Bennett Greene‘s 11 points on the Platform making the gap a little more comfortable over NC State, while California were indebted to Joshua Thai and his 13 diving points as they finished 11 points ahead of Michigan. Virginia had a huge day as they scored 82 points.

Final Standings

  1. Texas — 445.5
  2. Florida — 416
  3. Indiana — 351
  4. Arizona St — 328
  5. Tennessee — 272
  6. NC State — 258.5
  7. California — 231
  8. Michigan — 220
  9. Virginia — 192
  10. Stanford — 136
  11. Virginia Tech — 86
  12. Louisville — 82
  13. Ohio State — 72
  14. USC — 69
  15. Georgia — 64.5
  16. LSU — 61
  17. Auburn — 55
  18. Kentucky — 52
  19. UNC — 50.5
  20. Pittsburgh — 48
  21. Miami (FL) — 46
  22. Princeton — 45
  23. SMU — 44
  24. Alabama — 41
  25. Florida St — 40
  26. Northwestern — 39
  27. Arizona — 35
  28. Missouri — 32.5
  29. Purdue — 32
  30. Texas A&M — 28
  31. Minnesota — 22
  32. Wisconsin — 19
  33. U.S. Military Academy — 17.5
  34. Yale/Utah/Georgia Tech — 17
  35. Notre Dame — 16
  36. Delaware — 12
  37. Harvard — 9
  38. IU Indianapolis — 6
  39. Penn State — 5

Now that we have the overall picture out of the way, it is important to look at how all of the projected and actual scoring teams fared relative to their seeds. While small point margins might not appear to make a difference, it can be a huge factor in momentum as the meet continues.

You can see the scored psych sheet here, including an event-by-event breakdown.

Day 4 Scoring

School Projected Swimming Points Scored Diving Points Scored Difference vs seed
Texas 103 105 0 +5
Indiana 66 93 4 +27
Arizona St 99.5 83 0 -16.5
NC State 87 83 0 -4
Virginia 63.5 82 0 +18.5
Florida 77 69 16 -8
Tennessee 51 62 11 +11
Michigan 64 57 0 -7
Arizona 24 33 0 +9
California 27 32 13 +5
Pittsburgh 18 29 0 +11
Stanford 37 22 19 -15
Princeton 21 20 0 -1
VA Tech 21 19 0 -2
LSU 32 17 15 -15
Minnesota 3 15 7 +12
Georgia 15 14 0 -1
Alabama 16 14 0 -2
Florida St 39 14 1 -25
UNC 20 12.5 9 -7.5
Auburn 0 11 0 +11
Louisville 5 10 0 +5
Northwestern 5 10 0 +5
Ohio St 11 9 0 -2
Missouri 0 6.5 6 +6.5
USC 3 5 12 +2
SMU 0 3 0 +3
Notre Dame 9 0 0 -9
Texas A&M 6 0 20 -6
Wisconsin 6 0 0 -6
UNC Wilmington 1 0 0 -1
Purdue 0 0 22 0

Texas were the only team to crack 100 points today, scoring 105 to come in two above their projection. Scoring swims this morning from Cooper Lucas, Kyle Peck, Rex Maurer, and Garrett Gould were key to outperforming their seeded points.

Indiana were +27 as they put three in the 200 IM ‘A’ final and had Kai van Westering move from outside the top 16 to place 4th in the 200 back. Virginia were +18.5 for the day as they had Maximus Williamson (1st), Thomas Heilman (2nd) and David King (3rd) make individual podiums.

Auburn moved up from 0 points thanks to Abdalla Youssef making the 200 fly final, and Minnesota’s Jacob Johnson moved up from 14th to place 4th in the 200 fly. Pitt’s strong 400 free relay helped them to go +11 today.

On the flip side, ASU were -16.5 today against seed, as Adam Chaney moved from 4th to 28th in the 200 back, and Remi Fabiani missed the 100 free ‘A’ final in 9th. They did get maximum points in the 400 free relay, winning their fourth relay from five this week. Stanford were -15 with Gibson Holmes missing the 200 fly scoring after being ranked 8th. LSU missing the scoring in the 400 free relay and Jere Hribar moving down from the top seed in the 100 free saw them go -15.

The biggest faller though was FSU, who were DQed in the 400 free relay to see them go -25 for the day. Even without the DQ, they would have finished 17th and outside the points having been seeded for 22.

Total Meet Scoring

School Individual (Projected) Individual Relay (Projected) Relay Diving Total (Projected) Points Difference vs Seed
Texas 303 258.5 147 161 26 450 445.5 -30.5
Florida 196.5 226 138 132 58 334.5 416 23.5
Indiana 181 229 119 118 4 300 351 47
Arizona St 159 146 182 182 0 341 328 -13
Tennessee 101.5 114 86 105 53 187.5 272 31.5
NC State 145.5 128.5 114 130 0 259.5 258.5 -1
California 105 110 112 108 13 217 231 1
Michigan 115 90 105 130 0 220 220 0
Virginia 67.5 108 44 84 0 111.5 192 80.5
Stanford 61 60 70 48 28 131 136 -23
VA Tech 33.5 42 40 44 0 73.5 86 12.5
Louisville 19 36 40 42 4 59 82 19
Ohio St 57 40 36 32 0 93 72 -21
USC 8 12 0 14 43 8 69 18
Georgia 41 56.5 52 8 0 93 64.5 -28.5
LSU 41 24 66 22 15 107 61 -61
Auburn 6 16 20 36 3 26 55 26
Kentucky 26 28 26 24 0 52 52 0
UNC 34 29.5 0 12 9 34 50.5 7.5
Pittsburgh 18 28 12 20 0 30 48 18
Miami (FL) 0 0 0 0 46 0 46 0
Princeton 29 29 14 16 0 43 45 2
SMU 0 3 6 4 37 6 44 1
Alabama 28 39 0 2 0 28 41 13
Florida St 50 17 74 22 1 124 40 -85
Northwestern 22 19 8 20 0 30 39 9
Arizona 27 21 2 12 2 29 35 4
Missouri 4.5 6.5 11 0 26 15.5 32.5 -9
Purdue 0 0 0 0 32 0 32 0
Texas A&M 6 4 0 4 20 6 28 2
Minnesota 3 15 0 0 7 3 22 12
Wisconsin 17 1 26 18 0 43 19 -24
U.S. Military Academy 27 17.5 0 0 0 27 17.5 -9.5
Yale 30 17 0 0 0 30 17 -13
Utah 0 0 0 0 17 0 17 0
GT 0 0 0 0 17 0 17 0
Notre Dame 12 12 0 0 4 12 16 0
Delaware 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 12
Harvard 16 9 0 0 0 16 9 -7
IU Indianapolis 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 6
Penn State 18 5 0 0 0 18 5 -13
Penn 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 -4
South Carolina 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 -2
UNC Wilmington 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1

The biggest risers by far this week were Virginia, who went +80.5 thanks to an almost equal rise of +40.5 individually and +40 on relays. Indiana (+47) and Tennessee (+31) moved up thanks to exceeding their projections, with Tennessee’s 53 points on the boards the difference between finishing 5th and finishing 8th.

Cal needed Joshua Thai‘s 13 points on the Platform to finish above Michigan, as he outscored the entire swim team on day 4. Auburn were +26 for the meet to double their projections and finish 17th.

LSU had half their projection, losing big points on relays and due to Jere Hribar‘s DQ in the 50 free. Florida State were the biggest movers of anyone, either up or down, as they lost 85 points against their seed positions.

In This Story

21
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

21 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
JimSwim22
2 months ago

The grammar for sentences about each school should be was not were. A university is a singular not a group.

Admin
Reply to  JimSwim22
2 months ago

Hi Jim, Sam is British. In British English, they traditionally use collective verbs when team is the subject.

Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
2 months ago

Take note Todd DeSorbo. The University of Texas won a NCAA DI Men’s title without a single point in the 1650 FR. Time for Cavan Gormsen to strictly focus on the 200 FR & 500 FR should the 1650 FR remain on the Day 1 schedule.

Swammer
Reply to  Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
2 months ago

Give it a rest dude

Riptide
Reply to  Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
2 months ago

And UVA did it without any divers or diving coach, so does that mean Texas should get rid of divers?

Robert
2 months ago

Texas did enough. I am not a fan but it shows how much quality they have that they could swim the way they did and still win.

If Kos and Maurer were appropriately seeded in the 100 fly / 200 back they would have been more like -55 from seeds.

You have to swim well during the year to even be in that position though.

PowerPlay
2 months ago

For top 10 teams it would be interesting what their total payroll is for their swimmers. Would it equal about $2000 per point scored? Could get a look at which program has best return on investment. Don’t know if NCAA or schools have to disclose that info.

Admin
Reply to  PowerPlay
2 months ago

They don’t, and they won’t. All we have is anecdote and rumor.

MigBike
2 months ago

FSU the big time winner of the Reverse Donkey Riding Competition with – 85 based on seed.

SWIMMER
2 months ago

The VT men’s team have done well to get 11th considering they lost some big names from last year, I think they were predicted to get 25th at the start of the year

go hokies
Reply to  SWIMMER
2 months ago

Swimswam didn’t rank VT even in top 25 until after ACCs.

https://swimswam.com/2025-26-ncaa-mens-power-rankings-pre-conferences-edition/#comment-1667278

VT did amazing with 1 returning scorer/relay swimmer from 2025 – a total rebuild – sophmores scoring who didn’t even qualify last year, unranked freshman qualifying, 2 freshman splitting 18s on the free relay, 4 scoring relays (3 team records). And they went all out at ACCs to get those qualifiers and followed up with strong NCAA to move up from seed.

Swimmer
2 months ago

Great showing by UVA. Interesting that the men dropped a tonne of time at NCs whereas the women seem to be able to swim pretty fast all year. Any idea why that would be? (This is a genuine question rather than a criticism given that the same coach heads up both men and women)

Admin
Reply to  Swimmer
2 months ago

I think it’s physiology, and something that maybe the Virginia coaches learned from and tweaked from last year where they didn’t swim well at NCAAs.

Oldmanswimmer
2 months ago

I’m not that good at keeping up with best times, but it seems like some of the stars were pretty far off their lifetime bests in the psych sheets. I’m sure that is true for many schools that recruit well. It would be an interesting analysis to look at a scored meet using lifetime bests as the entries rather than the seed times. I just wonder how that would change our impression of who did well and who just got back to where they already were. I was just thinking about how a team that recruits superstars can look great at the big meets, but the question is still, how much did they actually improve. This is just curiosity. And… Read more »