2025-26 NCAA Men’s Power Rankings: Pre-Conferences Edition

by Sean Griffin 85

February 10th, 2026 College, News

As in previous years, SwimSwam’s Power Rankings are somewhere between the CSCAA-style dual meet rankings and a pure prediction of NCAA finish order. SwimSwam’s rankings take into account how a team looks at the moment, while keeping the end of the season in mind through things like a team’s previous trajectory and NCAA scoring potential. These rankings are by nature subjective, and a jumping-off point for discussion. If you disagree with any team’s ranking, feel free to make your case in our comments section.   

James Sutherland, Braden Keith, Robert Gibbs, Madeline Folsom, Anya Pelshaw, and Terin Frodyma contributed to this report. 

The championship season is fast approaching for the 2025-26 season. And while there’s been a few changes in our Pre-Conference edition of the Division I men’s Power Rankings, things have stayed largely status quo from the last edition that we did after midseason invitationals. There are still some questions lingering about how teams may translate dual meet success–or struggle–into the championship format but largely, the NCAA picture is getting clearer.

There were no changes to the top-7 ranked teams, with Texas still the clear frontrunner to claim their second straight national championship. The only movement in the top ten came from Tennessee rising from #9 to #8, while Florida State climbed from #10 to tie Stanford at #9 after the Cardinal dropped from #8.

Virginia (+2) and Missouri (+2) had the biggest jumps, while Army (-3) took the steepest drop. Michigan fell two spots (-2) to #15 amid mid-season coaching changes, and Alabama slipped two places (-2) to #21. Auburn and LSU each dropped one spot, with LSU falling from #12 to #13 and Auburn sliding from #16 to #17. #14 Ohio State and #16 USC each climbed one position.

Purdue and Northwestern both entered the rankings from honorable mentions post-invites, while North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Texas A&M fell out of the standings. North Carolina seems like a key team to move back into the rankings post-ACCs, assuming their elite breaststroke duo of Ben Delmar and Xavier Rui continues to impress and the team maybe finds another breakthrough that could score at NCAAs.

These rankings were heavily informed, though not dictated by, the pre-conferences scoring exercise. The simulation uses each swimmer’s season-best times from their three top events, with diving factored into our ballots separately.

Previous Rankings: 

Honorable Mentions: Princeton Tigers, North Carolina Tar Heels, Southern Methodist University Mustangs, Kentucky Wildcats

#25: Penn State Nittany Lions — (Previous Rank: 25)

This is shaping up to be Penn State’s best team in over a decade, if the Nittany Lions can keep their momentum going into championship season. – R.G.

#24: Yale Bulldogs — (Previous Rank: 24)

If Noah Millard rounds back into form in the post-season and approaches or improves upon his 4:07.68/14:28.43 distance freestyle times from 2024-25, he alone could push the Bulldogs into the top 25 after guiding them to 20th a year ago. – S.G.

#23: Army Black Knights -3 (Previous Rank: 20)

Johnny Crush and Kohen Rankin are capable of having big scoring ‘A’ final swims in one event each at NCAAs, but the key for Army will be scoring more than four relay points at NCAAs, which was their total last year en route to a 30th-place finish. – J.S.

#22: Purdue Boilermakers — (Previous Rank: HM)

Diving remains a massive strength for the Boilermakers. They return sophomore Kaden Springfield (16 points) and junior Maxwell Miller (8 points), while freshman Junior National Champion Nathaniel Grannis looks like a legitimate title contender. – S.G.

#21: Alabama Crimson Tide -2 (Previous Rank: 19)

Leo Alcantara looks like he could be a top 8 scorer in the distance freestyles. – A.P.

#20: Northwestern Wildcats — (Previous Rank: HM)

Josh Staples and Stuart Seymour are two of the major components to Northwestern’s success here in the coming weeks. Seymour has an outside chance of going into the NCAA’s as the Big Ten champ in the 100 back and could make some noise in the 100 free. Staples is among the top IMers and mid distance freestylers in the conference, and also could shake things up in the conference. – T.F.

#19: Missouri Tigers +2 (Previous Rank: 21)

Sophomore Luke Nebrich had been a force for Mizzou this season, and his relay and individual point contributions will be huge in improving the Tigers 10 points and 36th place finish from last year. – M.F.

#18: Arizona Wildcats — (Previous Rank: 18)

Sophomore Tomas Lukminas (41.33/1:31.88 free) is ranked 8th nationally in the 200 and 9th in the 100, while senior Haakon Naughton (44.80/1:40.70 fly) is ranked 10th in the 100 and 11th in the 200. Both are poised to score big at NCAAs, and the team has several relays ranked in the top 16. – S.G.

#17: Auburn Tigers -1 (Previous Rank: 16)

Although Auburn lost to Alabama, they won both relays, which relays are what boosts them right now in the Swimulator. – A.P.

#16: USC Trojans +1 (Previous Rank: 17)

Similar to Arizona, the Trojans have a clear formula for success: the Chmielewski brothers plus several scoring relays. – S.G.

#15. Michigan Wolverines -2 (Previous Rank: 13)

Sometimes when coaches leave mid-season it can disrupt a team. Sometimes, it can be addition by subtraction. The fate of the Wolverines might depend on how they respond to adversity. – B.K.

#14: Ohio State Buckeyes +1 (Previous Rank: 15)

The Buckeyes’ ultimate outcome may depend on how many diving points they can pick up, but the swimming side continues to look solid, with big peformances from Tristan Jankovics and Matt Klinge. – R.G.

#13. LSU Tigers -1 (Previous Rank: 12)

LSU has a few weapons at their disposal, but none are more prominent than Jere Hribar who sits in the top 8 in the country in 2 different events and sits just outside scoring position in a 3rd. He picked up two medals at the 2025 SC Euros in December, and looks to be primed for a similar performance at NCAAs. – M.F.

#12: Virginia Cavaliers +2 (Previous Rank: 14)

Like I said in December, I think that Virginia’s relays have more than the 16 points they’re currently projected to score in them. Given they are one of the teams that haven’t contested the 800 free relay this season, I think that’s around 30 points alone given they have the freshman duo of Maximus Williamson and Thomas Heilman, along with sophomore David King, who have all been 1:31 or faster from a flat start in their careers. The swimulator projects them to finish 14th as things currently stand, but adding 30 points puts them in a tie for 10th. If Maximus Williamson and Thomas Heilman approach their best times, I think they can finish higher than 12th. – S.G.

#11: Louisville Cardinals — (Previous Rank: 11)

The swimulator projects 78 points coming to the Cardinals by way of relays, which is not too far-fetched, though outside of Jackson Millard, and possibly Guy Brooks, there are not any other serious double-digit point-scoring threats. – T.F.

=#9: Stanford Cardinal -1 (Previous Rank: 8)

Stanford had a massive meet against Cal to kick the month off, taking the win against a team that is struggling this season. They picked up some strong freshmen, including Ethan Ekk, who will be huge point scorers for them next month. – M.F.

=#9: Florida State Seminoles +1 (Previous Rank: 10)

FSU’s relays are the main reason why the Swimulator has them sitting eighth entering the postseason. That ranking will drop once more teams swim the 800 free relay, but there is something to be said to what the Seminoles have done this season, ranking top-six in both medleys (and 2nd in the 800 free relay) entering conference season. Logan Robinson has also been a star for them with standout swims in the 200 free and 200 fly in the fall. Anything around the top 10 would be an improvement after placing 18th last year. – J.S.

#8: Tennessee Volunteers +1 (Previous Rank: 9)

Tennessee is hurting with the loss of Jordan Crooks, but their relays still have strong point scoring potential. Gui Caribe holds he fastest time in the country in the 100 free and the 3rd fasetst time in the 50 free, which will earn the Vols valuable points in March. – M.F.

#7: California Golden Bears — (Previous Rank: 7)

It almost feels weird ranking Cal so low this season, but the numbers speak for themselves. The Bears always seem to have a rabbit to pull out of their hat in the postseason. Yamato Okadome was their breakout freshman last year, and now they’ve got Ryan Erisman and Nathan Wiffen to go along with Lucca Battaglini’s standout sophomore campaign. They’ve also got some sneaky solid relay pieces, but it was still be a surprise to see them break into the top five at NCAAs. – J.S.

#6: NC State Wolfpack — (Previous Rank: 6)

Arsenio Bustos hasn’t show much this season after redshirting last season. If he can get back to his 2024 form, that’ll be a big boost for the Wolfpack, both at ACCs and NCAAs. – R.G.

#5: Florida Gators — (Previous Rank: 5)

The potential duo of Jaouadi and Hafnaoui in distance events for the Gators makes me really excited for SECs, especially if we get a tapered Hafnaoui for a championship in yards. The relay battles with UGA and Texas will also be blockbuster matchups prior to their NCAA showdowns. – T.F.

#4: Georgia Bulldogs — (Previous Rank: 4)

Not much has changed for Georgia within the past month, as Luca Urlando, Tomis Koski, Drew Hitchcock, Ruard Van Renen, and Eliot Woodburn are all still swimming great. While they may not shine depth-wise at SECs, their top-end scoring ability will serve them well at NCAAs. – S.G.

#3: Indiana Hoosiers — (Previous Rank: 3)

Zalan Sarkany has been unstoppable thus far for Indiana and looks like one of the few who could threaten Rex Maurer in the 500. But Indiana’s depth, with Olympians Luke Whitlock and Aaron Shackell, is crucial. Owen McDonald also looks like a potential top-five swimmer in several events for the Hoosiers and has found some success against high-level opponents as of late. The likelihood of them taking the Big Ten title is high, but individual events could help set the Hoosiers apart from the potential cluster of teams ranked 3-7. – T.F.

#2: Arizona State Sun Devils — (Previous Rank: 2)

On one hand, it feels like the Sun Devils had a relatively-quiet January. On the other hand, at the Big 12 West Championship, their 200 free relay went 1:15.01, faster than any other team this season. And that wasn’t even their full ‘A’ lineup. And then over the weekend against Arizona, they went 1:14.68…with a pair of 18.3 split on another relay. – R.G.

#1: Texas Longhorns — (Previous Rank: 1)

The Longhorns were already the leader in the NCAA and Hubert Kos has since returned. There’s not much that seems will stop them from raising the trophy. – A.P.

Ballots:

Rank Anya Robert Madeline James Braden Sean Terin
1 Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas
2 Arizona State Arizona State Arizona State Arizona State Arizona State Arizona State Arizona State
3 Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana
4 Georgia Florida Georgia Georgia Cal Florida Florida
5 Florida Georgia Florida NC State Georgia Georgia Georgia
6 NC State Cal NC State Florida NC State NC State NC State
7 Cal NC State Cal Cal Florida Cal Cal
8 Florida State Stanford Florida State Stanford Tennessee Florida State Florida State
9 Stanford Tennessee Tennesseee Tennessee Louisville Tennessee Tennessee
10 Tennessee Florida State Stanford Louisville Stanford Stanford Stanford
11 Louisville LSU Virginia Virginia Florida State Virginia Louisville
12 LSU Louisville Louisville Florida State Virginia Louisville Virginia
13 Ohio State Virginia LSU LSU LSU LSU LSU
14 Michigan Michigan Michigan Ohio State Ohio State Michigan Ohio State
15 Virginia Ohio State Ohio State Michigan Michigan Ohio State Michigan
16 USC USC USC USC USC USC Auburn
17 Auburn Auburn Auburn Auburn Purdue Auburn Arizona
18 Arizona Arizona Arizona Arizona Auburn Arizona USC
19 Alabama Missouri Missouri Missouri UNC Missouri Missouri
20 Missouri Northwestern Alabama Yale Yale Purdue Northwestern
21 Northwestern Alabama Army Purdue Missouri Northwestern Purdue
22 Army Army Northwestern Army Alabama UNC Alabama
23 Penn State Princeton Prinecton Northwestern Army Yale Penn State
24 Yale Penn State Penn State Princeton Northwestern Army Princeton
25 Princeton Yale Yale SMU Penn State Penn State Kentucky

85
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

85 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
MDS
4 months ago

Not that it is a big deal, but on R.G.’s notation about ASU’s recent 4×50 Free relay, 1:15.01 was their seed time, not their swim time.

Actually their A was 1:14.68, with the B at 1:15.36.

Editor
Reply to  MDS
4 months ago

Technically, you’re correct, but so am I. They did go 1:15.01 at the Big 12 West Championships. Hence, that was their seed time last weekend’s seed time again Arizona, where they went 1:14/1:15. I think I wrote my bullet point before that meet was done. But, I’ve added a mention of that into the writeup, thanks!

randomswimmer2
4 months ago

While I love this UGA team and I think they are going to great at NCAAs, I’m not sure I would put them over UF. I feel pretty good about UF having several great scorers in Liendo, Jaouadi, Marshall along with scoring well in their relays across the board. Not to mention other good depth scorers on their roster.

Editor
Reply to  randomswimmer2
4 months ago

I voted for Florida finishing above Georgia, but there is a 70 point gap right now. To the extent that these power rankings are 1) subjective and 2) a blend of prognostication, recognition of who’s been swimming well, and track record, I don’t think it’s crazy to rank Georgia higher at the moment, but I would be moderately surprised if Florida doesn’t pull ahead after SECs.

Felix Fandango
4 months ago

Florida have already beaten UGA twice this season, make this make sense.

Admin
Reply to  Felix Fandango
4 months ago

This is not a dual meet poll. Hope it makes sense now!

Concerned Collegiate Fan
Reply to  Braden Keith
4 months ago

Florida has consistently dropped more than most top teams from dual meet season to championship season. Why do you never approve comments that directly criticize your questionable diligence Braden?

Admin
Reply to  Concerned Collegiate Fan
4 months ago

The data does not support that: https://swimswam.com/psych-vs-seed-which-mens-teams-perform-better-and-which-perform-worse-at-ncaas-2025/
This data does not include SECs, so your synopsis might be true if SECs are included in “drop from dual meets to championship season,” but this is a ranking geared toward NCAA finish, and there the Gators have not recently improved often at NCAAs versus seed, as a whole.

I approve comments that disagree with me all the time. I did not approve the comment from your teammate asking if the Florida coaches slept with my wife, which was a really high quality message to receive 90 minutes after she gave birth to our first son. Nor did I approve the comment from your teammate accusing me of being… Read more »

Felix Fandango
Reply to  Braden Keith
4 months ago

You have zero ball knowledge

Admin
Reply to  Felix Fandango
4 months ago

I don’t know who needs to tell you this, but just repeating a clever thing you saw someone else say on the internet doesn’t actually make you, yourself, knowledgeable, interesting, or clever.

If you want people to respect you, try saying something interesting. Life is not a tired ass meme.

USCGCKs
4 months ago

The yearly UVA rankflation

Glad my son is a senior
Reply to  USCGCKs
4 months ago

Didn’t they get smoked by Virginia Tech a few weeks ago. UVA gets a +2 and VT nothing?

ArtVanDeLegh10
4 months ago

Heilman and Williamson alone will garner big NCAA points. King should also score.

You may not like them and they might have a track record of developing male swimmers, but they will score some points at NCAAs.

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  ArtVanDeLegh10
4 months ago

I agree with your comment but that’s gotta be a typo right?

ArtVanDeLegh10
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
4 months ago

Yes it was a typo.

Even though they do NOT have the recent history of developing male swimmers, Heilman and Williamson are so good, if they go their HS times, they’ll final in at least 3-4 events.

To finish 15 at NCAAs you don’t need much depth.

wild
Reply to  ArtVanDeLegh10
4 months ago

They’ll score, it’s the lack of depth among the team that is worrying. Besides those three, no one else is projected to score. If that’s the case do they really have a good track record of developing male swimmers?

McQueen
Reply to  ArtVanDeLegh10
4 months ago

Saying they have a track record of developing male swimmers is definitely an interesting statement

Bobthebuilderrocks
4 months ago

I think we’re in store for an interesting April with the UVA men

wild
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
4 months ago

The transfer portal:

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  wild
4 months ago

I think we’re gonna be really surprised by what happens

wild
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
4 months ago

I’ll be a bit surprised if there isn’t at least one UVA men’s swimmer in the portal.
And while I don’t think it will happen, I agree with you: Maximus to Austin

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  wild
4 months ago

I’m seeing way more activity on Texas’ instagram from UVA swimmers than I would have guessed.

wild
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
4 months ago

👀👀👀

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  wild
4 months ago

I could be wrong, I just think it’s a little interesting that Williamson/Heilman/King all liked Texas’ “1 week out from SECs” post. Not sure how many other swimmers are out liking other team’s posts from what I’ve seen

wild
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
4 months ago

oh wow, yeah I don’t got insta so I didn’t see but that’s quite interesting to say the least…….

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  wild
4 months ago

I guess King unliked it but yeah there is some interesting engagement by arguably UVA’s top 3 guys with Bob and Texas stuff. Personally haven’t seen that very often especially a week out from conference

Go Bears
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
4 months ago

What a joke if those guys both transfer to Texas. Just cancel the NCAA season and have a Texas vs. the field all star event.

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  Go Bears
4 months ago

I could be way off but it just feels like weird timing to see them liking Texas stuff. The Heilman stuff could be me being delusional but I find it hard to believe that someone like Maximus following 90 something accounts and having 5k followers while engaging with a lot of Texas’ stuff on social media doesn’t mean something.

Jesse
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
4 months ago

The likelihood of Heilman leaving UVA is zero. Not happening.

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  Jesse
4 months ago

Pretty sure I read that about Maurer and Stanford years ago

Horninco
Reply to  Go Bears
4 months ago

Agree it’s not great for the sport when one team is so dominant that the outcome is a forgone conclusion before the competition even begins

Think how awesome it was to see Indiana football come out of nowhere in 24 months. Would be really interesting to see that happen in swimming. Imagine a school like West Virginia winning NCAA’s in 2028. Would be incredible

Pandora’s box has been opened though

It comes down to Bob Bowman. Like it or not he is the best coach in history (arguably?). Everyone wants to swim for him and with the others that do as well. Talent attracts talent.

Parity would be great, but swimming just comes down to who… Read more »

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  Horninco
4 months ago

I feel like other teams are lucky Bob’s 60 and not 40 or something.

The Thailand Elephant
Reply to  Horninco
4 months ago

My GOAT wouldn’t have safesport allegations but that’s just me

HossFly
Reply to  wild
4 months ago

More swimmers to TX…boring.

Swammer123
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
4 months ago

The way you love bob is so weird to me. He might be the best IM men coach but not every good swimmer should be at Texas.

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  Swammer123
4 months ago

I’d take Eddie any day of the week but also I don’t get your point. Leave it to swimming fans not wanting to see fast swimming

Show me a program doing what Texas is doing and I’d be a fan of them too. What Texas has been doing the last year is the most interesting thing I’ve seen in the NCAA in a while

Swammer123
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
4 months ago

Literally uva women but you hate them

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  Swammer123
4 months ago

Woah wtf. Where did that come from?

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  Swammer123
4 months ago

Now you’re what I call a swimswam commenter. My last comment on the UVA women was that they recruited 2/3 of their sub 4:05 IMers as sub 4:05 400 IMers and that must mean I hate them.

Hoffer>
4 months ago

Bruh what

Antagonizing gopher
4 months ago

Why aren’t we voting Minnesota at all?? This list is insane. Not one vote?? I know this isn’t our year but this is disrespectful to the prestigie of UM. Don’t you remember Mchugh??

Admin
Reply to  Antagonizing gopher
4 months ago

Sometimes it’s hard to tell which comments are satire and which comments are not.

Sparkle
Reply to  Braden Keith
4 months ago

Why didn’t you rank Arizona higher??? Do you not remember what Darian Townsend did in 2008????

Antagonizing gopher
Reply to  Sparkle
4 months ago

You get it bro…

Horninco
Reply to  Braden Keith
4 months ago

Talented satire and deranged fandom only have a degree or two of separation