USA Swimming Unveils Stepped-Up 2013-2016 Motivational Times

Braden Keith
by Braden Keith 16

September 05th, 2012 Club, News

USA Swimming has unveiled their new Motivational Time Standards for the 2013-2016 seasons. It comes as no surprise, based on what we’ve been seeing as age group swimmers have gotten better-and-better, but the times have been ratcheted up for the upcoming four years as training develops, technique develops, and more of the best athletes are kept in the sport.

These times on some level are arbitrary, as they won’t qualify anybody for a National Championship meet, but they are still very important. Not the least of which is in the name: motivation. Young swimmers who can call themselves an “A” swimmer versus a “BB” swimmer feels a huge upgrade in confidence, and reaching for these times give young athletes an idea of what they should be shooting for.

These times are also used often to determine eligibility for certain local meets, and for determining training groups. The drop will, at least in the short term, shift numbers away from A & Up meets to BB & Under meets, which may not be unintentional.

See the full 2013-2016 time standards here.
See the full 2009-2012 time standards here, to compare.

USA Swimming has done an analysis of how much change there has been between the old standards and the new, specifically at the AAAA (highest) level. Many of these standards have increased in difficulty by over 2%, and most are over 1% (though not every time has changed).

To describe what that means, this year’s 17-18 boys could earn a AAAA time in the 400 yard IM in 4:07.09. Next year, they’ll have to be a 4:02.59. During the 2011-2012 season, 292 17-18 boys nationwide made the AAAA standard in the event. Under the new guidelines that would have been slashed to 160.

Looking at another time, at random, an 11-12 girl would now need a 2:18.19 to make an A time in the 200 yard freestyle. Last year, that would have been a 2:19.89 – almost two seconds slower. 4,971 girls hit that time last year. Under the new standards, that would have been 4274 swimmers, or about 700 fewer.

To see USA Swimming’s full percentage change analysis, click here.

Is this a good thing or a bad thing? That probably depends on who you are. Some might argue that faster swimmers should be given more space to navigate at their meets, but others would retort that the overall development in the sport is better when, at the youth levels, athletes have the chance to race against better and tougher competition than themselves.

Either ways, the new times have been installed, and are probably in general a pretty fair progression to the time drops we’ve seen nationwide since the old standards were installed in 2008.

Get ready to step up coaches!

Leave a Reply

8 Comment threads
8 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Coach Peter

I’m guessing that the 2:18.19 for 11-12 year old girls is for the free and not the “100”??

Coach Peter

that should read -200- free and not “100”


Perhaps mention in the article that the times noted are short course yards (unless I missed it somewhere…, or is it just assumed because age-groupers swim SCY?)…when I saw that 4:02 400IM time I was so confused because it’s faster that the LCM world record! I wonder how this will affect the olympic trials cut times. One thing I’ve noticed is that young swimmers often succeed at the trials level after having experienced it one time previously (even if there was no realistic chance of making the team). Just simply having the experience of racing in such a public arena as well as watching world-class swimmers race increases the level of motivation in these kids. They then go back home… Read more »


I have to both agree and disagree with Anonymous regarding the trials. I agree that it is a good thing for young swimmers to get to experience the trials. Kara Lynn Joyce did not do well at all at the 2000 Trials and then made the team in 2004. I disagree that having tons of kids at the trials hampers things and that they should emulate the Olympics. This year there were more kids than ever at Trials and our Olympic team ultimately performed fanatastically well. Limiting Trials so the elite swimmers don’t have to hang at the pool very long is only short-sighted. The Trials experience means everything to the future of USA Swimming.

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder of He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »