FINA’s Congress Officially Abolishes Age Limits, Approves 3rd Term

The world’s aquatic governing body, FINA, has just announced the approval of six new proposals under review at the organization’s Extraordinary Congress held in Kazan, Russia before the start of the 2015 World Championships.  The new amendments can be read in full here, but there are two quote controversial proposals that will no doubt draw further fire from some in the swimming community.

The first controversial approved amendment is the elimination of age limits of elected FINA members, including the role of President. FINA rules prior to the Congress’ session stated that the maximum age of elected Bureau members ‘must be no more than eighty (80) years in the year of the election to the FINA Bureau’.  Incumbent, FINA President, Julio César Maglione, is in the midst of his second term, which runs until 2017 when he will be the age of 81.  The passing of this amendment now supports Maglione continuing past 80.

When hearing about the proposal back in April, John Leonard, World Swim Coaches Association (WSCA) Executive Director was vocal on his opposition of the deletion of age limits, saying, “While a discussion of the age of FINA Bureau members is entirely relevant, the deletion of Age Limits completely is a blatant attempt to protect the aging President of FINA, now in his 8th decade. Worse, the current President came to office initially on a campaign to create an age limit (which removed his most serious competition in his first election…). Now, the same man expects us to remove the age limit that he applied, because he wants to continue to serve beyond the current age limit!”

The other contentious amendment passed in the extraordinary Congress was that of now allowing three terms; “The President, First Vice President and Honorary Treasurer may be elected for a maximum of three full terms in the same post.” Implementation of this new rule boosts the current term limit of just two years, which means we could be seeing Maglione as FINA President through a third term, which would run until 2021.

This amendment was brought to the table for consideration last spring and was immediately met with hostility. Lawrie Cox, Secretary of the Oceania Swimming Association and former Australian Delegate to FINA Congress (2009-11), voiced opposition, saying “the campaign made by those supporting Julio Maglione [for FINA President in 2009] was based on not allowing a President to hold office in the future for more than two consecutive terms.”  Cox also indicated that, at the time, it was made clear by Maglione’s proponents that he would only “serve one term and enable a hand over in 2013 to new blood.”  In summary, Cox exclaims, “Time to go Julio and take the Bureau members who supported the proposed amendments with you.”

Leonard further echoed this opinion at the time of proposal, saying,  Maglione “promised he would serve no more than two terms….And of course in his first term, he promised to serve no more than ONE term! We can expect this to change again in 2021, when he wants to serve a FOURTH term.”

However, Maglione does have his share of support.  After its quadrennial general assembly in Toronto prior to the Pan American Games, the Amateur Swimming Union of the Americas (known as UANA) had officially endorsed the current FINA president to serve a third term.

Of the outcome of the Congress’ session, Maglione says, “The recent successes of FINA have always been made with your support throughout the years and successive Congresses. FINA firmly believes that Sport is the key for a better and peaceful world, highlighting the values of a healthier lifestyle, social inclusion and fair-play, in a spirit of friendship and respect. I am happy that we all share these values and, united like a family, we work together to achieve our objectives.”


Leave a Reply

Notify of
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
6 years ago

These guys just gave all swimmers the middle finger

David Berkoff
6 years ago

The arrogance.of this organization is unbelievable. It needs to be disbanded and fully investigated by the IOC. FINA’s governance is akin to North Korea — a dictator with a bunch of mostly hand picked supplicants who will rubber stamp anything so long as the free trips and cash per diems keep coming.

Joel Lin
Reply to  David Berkoff
6 years ago

Julio down voted you.

David Berkoff
Reply to  Joel Lin
6 years ago

And apparently you too.

6 years ago

People the last couple of days on the message boards: “these crooks got to go!”

Response from FINA: “haha. Let’s make some rules to ensure we are here till death”


Coach Jim
6 years ago

Modeled after FIFA?

Joel Lin
6 years ago

It seems like only yesterday that FINA awarded another event to the UAE region and also scored lower than FIFA in terms of good governance practices. No wait…that was only yesterday.

Two things, I glad to have the Berkoff Blast back in the house. Second, is FINA taking resumes? This sounds like a really good job considering only 66% of the delegates bothered to show up for a recent vote.

Seriously: is an FOIA request for records from the IOC or from FINA at all possible? How about from USOC given they were a client of TSE Consulting for the failed 2016 Chicago bid. How hard could it be to get to the bottom of this with just a few… Read more »

Reply to  Joel Lin
6 years ago

Tse consulting is nothing more than a lobbyist for governments and sports organization wanting to host competitions…You dont need a FOIA request to see the smoking gun here

Joel Lin
Reply to  ta
6 years ago

You are absolutely correct on the smoking gun comment, but my question goes further. TSE Consulting SA is a Swiss domiciled subsidiary of TSE Group plc, a UK based firm. In plain English, that means this is all at least two layers deep and buried in a country which has strident banking privacy laws. This isn’t some honkey tonk LLC in Indiana that Dale Neuburger does a managing member tax filing and takes a K-1 income from every year.

If I were a lobbyist for an organization like, say maybe Dubai’s sports federation to an organization where I am also the second highest ranking official…and let’s just call that being the VP of the FINA Bureau to keep this example… Read more »

Lane Four
6 years ago


Swimmer A
6 years ago

Glad to see they don’t take themselves too seriously

6 years ago

I understand that swimming is not soccer (ok, football for those of you outside the US), on the world stage, but perhaps someone like ESPN or ProPublica would be interested in this story. FINA is repeating many of the mistakes and ethical lapses FIFA made on the surface (who knows what shady dealings or potential crimes occur behind the curtains) and this is worthy of a spotlight in the public eye. Any time an international association starts to agree on and promulgate administrative actions like those you highlight above, we now know we should all be suspicious that influence is being curried (or bought).

About Retta Race

Retta Race

Swim analyst, businesswoman.

Read More »