Data Visualization Maps Out The Tight Race for a Top 5 Finish At 2023 Men’s NCAAs

2023 NCAA DIVISION I MEN’S SWIMMING & DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS

The 2023 Men’s Division I NCAA Championships are just under 24 hours from kicking off in Minneapolis, so let’s take a look at how the meet would turn out if everything happened exactly the way it’s projected to on paper, according to the official pre-scratch psych sheets.

It’s important to keep in mind that the psych sheet does not include diving points.

Division I Men’s NCAA Championship Scored Psych Sheet: Top 20 Teams

Cal is expected to repeat as the NCAA champions, racking up a projected point total of 453.5. Arizona State is hot on their heels though, seeded just 27 points behind the defending champions–a testament to both how fast they swam in-season and their performance en route to their first ever PAC-12 title. Bob Bowman reiterated post-conference that NCAAs is their focus this year, so it will be interesting to see if they can hold or improve on their seeds after already dropping so many fast times.

The visualization highlights something we’ve known about Cal for a long time: they get better as the meet goes on, and they’re ridiculously strong on day 4. The Golden Bears are expected to briefly take the lead after the 200 IM, but hand it back to Florida after the 50 free. In fact, for the majority of the meet it’s Florida and ASU that are expected to trade the lead until Cal takes over convincingly on day 4.

Of course, you have to show up and swim well to earn the points–that’s why the trophies aren’t handed out when the psych sheets drop. One team that the psych sheet undervalues is Texas, who after finishing in the top two the last eight seasons are running in seventh. We talked about this when the psych sheet first dropped: essentially, no matter how much stock you put into Texas’ seeding, they’re going to have to outperform their seeds to climb back to their usual spot in the standings.

It won’t just be Texas looking to climb up the standings, though. There’s a close race going on between six teams for a spot in the top 5, and even if first place gets locked up before the end of the meet there will still be tight battles going on for the rest of the team trophies.

Now, let’s take a closer look at the fight for top five.

Division I Men’s NCAA Championship Scored Psych Sheet: Top 7 Teams

Looking closer at the top seven teams shows how fluid the race for the title is expected to be. Florida and ASU are projected to be constantly trading the lead, making those depth swimmers and ‘B’ final races as important as ever. Additionally, they (and the rest of these teams) will be looking to outperform their seeds, something Cal has historically done very well.

This zoomed in perspective also shows that NC State is expected to be a solid fourth place. They’re expected to maintain that spot through the 500 free through the end of the meet. Points-wise, they’re on a bit of an island, over a 100 projected points behind #3 Florida but up on #5 Tennessee by nearly the same amount. In reality, we’d be quite surprised if there was this much of a gap in the middle of the standings.

Though the Tennessee women performed well at NCAAs and showed that there was a focus on NCAAs over SECs, we aren’t really expecting the Volunteers to get involved in the top 5 battle. Indiana is going to get a lot of diving points, which aren’t factored into this graph and Texas will likely outperform their seeds as well.

2023 Men’s NCAAs – PROJECTED TEAM STANDINGS

Data compiled by Andrew Mering

School Total Psych Individual Relay
California, University of, Berkeley 454 299.5 154
Arizona State University 427 254.5 172
Florida, University of 420 243.5 176
North Carolina State University 308 154 154
University of Tennessee 218 89.5 128
Indiana University 193 95 98
Texas, University of 170 114.5 55
VA Tech 144 85.5 58
Auburn University 134 45.5 88
Georgia, University of 128 80 48
Louisville, University of 126 45.5 80
Stanford University 122 39.5 82
Virginia, University of 97 26 71
Texas A&M University 92 66 26
Michigan, University of 86 46 40
Missouri, University of 74 36.5 37
Ohio State University 68 34.5 33
University of Alabama 51 29 22
University of Minnesota 33 33 0
Wisconsin, University of, Madison 26 25.5 0
Kentucky, University of 24 24 0
Arizona, University of 24 0 24
Georgia Institute of Technology 20 19.5 0
Yale University 16 16 0
Notre Dame, University of 15 15 0
US Air Force Academy (M) 15 15 0
Southern Illinois Univ atCarbondale (M) 13 12.5 0
Princeton University 12 12 0
Towson University 12 12 0
Harvard University 11 7 4
Utah, University of 11 11 0
Pittsburgh, University of 10 10 0
Louisiana State University 10 10 0
Northwestern University 5 5 0
South Carolina, University of, Columbia 4 4 0
Southern Methodist University 2 2 0
Florida State University 1 1 0

2023 Men’s NCAAs – PROJECTED TEAM SCORES AFTER EACH EVENT

Data compiled by Andrew Mering

200 Medley Relay 800 Freestyle Relay 500 Free 200 IM 50 Free 200 Freestyle Relay 400 IM 100 Fly 200 Free 100 Breast 100 Back 400 Medley Relay 1650 Free 200 Back 100 Free 200 Breast 200 Fly 400 Freestyle Relay
California, University of, Berkeley 28 58 96 129 140 168 199 199 202 221 243 271 271 324 357 382 414 454
Arizona State University 34 74 90 119 131 163 202 207 245 245 270 302 314 337 350 370 393 427
Florida, University of 32 66 104 104 143 183 194 210 214 251 271 311 333 333 359 384 390 420
North Carolina State University 30 58 67 90 96 130 130 168 180 180 197 231 252 256 257 257 280 308
University of Tennessee 40 40 40 40 75 105 108 125 125 125 125 151 151 151 180 185 186 218
Indiana University 8 34 34 34 38 48 48 61 68 77 92 122 122 122 133 139 169 193
Texas, University of 6 38 51 66 66 66 94 94 105 112 112 118 140 154 154 159 159 170
VA Tech 0 8 8 19 32 46 46 66 66 70 70 80 80 89 104 118 118 144
Auburn University 26 44 44 44 47 69 69 69 69 82 98 120 127 134 134 134 134 134
Georgia, University of 24 34 51 52 52 52 58 58 60 60 69 69 84 112 112 112 114 128
Louisville, University of 4 26 26 26 41 65 65 65 71 81 81 93 93 93 93 108 108 126
Stanford University 0 24 24 39 40 52 52 72 72 72 72 96 96 100 100 100 100 122
Virginia, University of 20 20 20 20 20 46 46 46 46 62 63 77 77 77 83 86 86 97
Texas A&M University 12 18 18 32 32 32 57 57 57 57 57 65 65 73 73 92 92 92
Michigan, University of 14 26 26 32 35 37 39 53 53 53 60 64 64 64 64 64 78 86
Missouri, University of 10 12 12 12 12 19 19 22 39 40 40 58 58 63 63 63 74 74
Ohio State University 20 20 20 20 20 27 27 30 39 39 39 41 50 50 64 64 64 68
University of Alabama 2 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 32 32 32 32 45 45 45 45 45 51
University of Minnesota 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 17 17 17 17 17 33 33 33
Wisconsin, University of, Madison 0 0 2 2 2 2 11 11 25 25 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 26
Kentucky, University of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 20 24 24
Arizona, University of 0 4 4 4 4 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 24
Georgia Institute of Technology 0 0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 19 20 20 20 20 20
Yale University 0 0 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 16 16 16
Notre Dame, University of 0 0 0 0 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 15 15 15 15
US Air Force Academy (M) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
Southern Illinois Univ atCarbondale (M) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13
Princeton University 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 12 12
Towson University 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Harvard University 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
Utah, University of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
Pittsburgh, University of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Louisiana State University 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 10 10 10 10
Northwestern University 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5
South Carolina, University of, Columbia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Southern Methodist University 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2
Florida State University 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

19
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

19 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Horninco
1 year ago

After Day 3 you will have 5 teams separated by about 35-40 points.

Cal pulls away Saturday.

PKWATER
1 year ago

Point totals for the 800 free relay look off.
I didn’t keep looking past that so might want to check your work.

Geoff
Reply to  PKWATER
1 year ago

Looks like they are cumulative team points through each event rather than point totals in the event itself. Agree the “PROJECTED TEAM SCORES BY EVENT” title is a little confusing, but the data for 800 FR looks reasonable.

Zthomas
1 year ago

While not likely in either case, Texas is more likely to score 51 points in the 500 than only have 51 points after the 500.

I don’t remember what year it was, maybe 2007, but Lochte and Florida had a killer SEC’s where they allegedly “were not tapered.” But then they performed about the same at NCAA. I won’t be surprised if this is what happens with ASU. Still a great team and a great season for them.

ZThomas
Reply to  Zthomas
1 year ago

So early returns suggest I was wrong about wrong about ASU. Awesome relays by them.

chazoozle
1 year ago

How does Cal always go so ham on the last day?

Andrew
Reply to  chazoozle
1 year ago

their 200s of strokes are absolutely loaded because of a multitude of factors

  • They have 6th year seniors
  • Recruiting violations
  • They bring in stud international kids with a month left in the season
  • Transfer portal violations
Put up or shut up
Reply to  Andrew
1 year ago

What did the NCAA say when you informed them of these multiple violations?

Lava Pup
Reply to  Andrew
1 year ago

They’ve discovered the magical “certificate in entrepreneurship” which allows dudes to swim for them for a year whilst mysteriously not attending class

swimmerswammer
Reply to  Andrew
1 year ago

lol and all of these infractions skew towards 200s?

PVSFree
1 year ago

What’s the highest amount of lead changes we’ve seen in one NCAA meet? This could be a very exciting meet if Florida and ASU NAIL their tapers or Cal falters

Back2Back
Reply to  PVSFree
1 year ago

Speaking of tapers: one word: Eddie and all that implies!

Horninco
1 year ago

Cal 1st 473

Florida 2nd 397
Texas 3rd 391

ASU 4th 356

NC State 5th 319
Indiana 6th 307
Tenn 7th 288

Swimmer205
1 year ago

Why is the second chart top 7 and not top 8? Top 8 teams get a trophy why knock out 8th place on the second visual chart?

Admin
Reply to  Swimmer205
1 year ago

We could do anything we wanted for any reason, but the reality is that there’s a pretty clear gap between the top 7 and the rest of the field, on paper, so that’s where we focused.

You can see the 8th team, Virginia Tech, in the top chart.

H20PoloFan2
1 year ago

Diving for Texas, Indiana and Tennessee could move that group up 50-120 points each.

GK the goat
Reply to  H20PoloFan2
1 year ago

It should’ve been easy to add in diving to this data

Zippo
Reply to  H20PoloFan2
1 year ago

Add diving.

Back2Back
Reply to  H20PoloFan2
1 year ago

Leave diving out of all of this swimming visualization/speculation…signed Longhorn Divers.

About Sophie Kaufman

Sophie Kaufman

Sophie grew up in Boston, Massachusetts, which means yes, she does root for the Bruins, but try not to hold that against her. At 9, she joined her local club team because her best friend convinced her it would be fun. Shoulder surgery ended her competitive swimming days long ago, …

Read More »