NCAA Men’s Pre-Cut Psych Sheets Revealed

The NCAA has released the men’s preselection entry list.

See the full preselection lists here.
(Updated 6:16PM Eastern Time – Most notable changes: Dartmouth’s Nejc Zupan reseeded in 200 IM; Cal’s Jamey Lyon scratched.)

Expect for a full, cut entry list to be revealed on Wednesday afternoon.

Among the more notable entries:

  • Florida’s Sebastien Rousseau is swimming the 500 free, the 400 IM, and the 200 fly. That 500 free is probably a little bit of a surprise for the first day as compared to the 200 IM. He ranks 10th in the country in the 200 IM, which he swam at SEC’s, but only 17th in the 500 free, which he didn’t.
  • His teammate Marcin Cieslak is swimming the 100 fly, the 200 fly, and the 200 IM. That is the expected lineup for him, as opposed to trying the 200 free on day 2, which he has done in the past.
  • Cal’s Tom Shields is taking on the 100 fly/100 back double, plus the 200 fly on Saturday. That’s the same as he did last year.
  • Auburn’s Marcelo Chierighini is swimming the 100 fly on day 2 of the meet, in addition to the 50 and 100 frees in which he’s a national title contender.
  • USC’s Vlad Morozov will swim the same individual lineup as he did at Pac-12’s: the 50 free, the 100 breast, and the 100 free. He was an Olympian in the 100 back, though all indicators were that this 100 breast was coming on the meet’s second day.
  • Texas’ Dax Hill, after trying some different things at Big 12’s, is back to his familiar 50/200/100 free lineup for NCAA’s.
  • The NCAA apparently didn’t accept Fabio Gimondi’s 100 free from the Georgia Tech last chance meet, despite accepting other swims from that meet. We have confirmed that this has to do with Gimondi swimming two Last Chance meets.
  • Notre Dame’s Frank Dyer has switched his 50 free from Big Easts, done for team purposes, back to the 100 free for NCAA’s.

In This Story

28
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

28 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
longseeker
11 years ago

JEANTUEHL:

Your comment that “Cal got smoked” in the 400F relay tells me you were not aware that Cal had the meet won unless they were disqualified in the last event relay. They made sure to not commit a mistake and swam safely. Surely, with all your aquatics knowledge, you get that. I think Cal did the same in a previous year so not to lose the title to Texas in the finals.

11 years ago

M_FAN … Michigan did NOT fully taper for Big Tens. Did you pay attention to our 2nd’s and 3rd’s that won those events last year? Not fully tapered. Went for the points not the win. You will see faster times out of these guys at NC’s.

ole 99
11 years ago

Based on the updated pre-cut sheet (Zupan’s 200 IM and no Jamey Lyon in the 1650) the Texas sprinters are out…

223 Colley, Ben FR UNC 28 200 Fly 0.961483322
224 Brumm, Pete FR Michigan 28 200 IM 0.956774255
225 Hurley, Mike SO Indiana 28 100 Breast 0.953863466
226 Frank, Simon JR Texas A&M 28 400 IM 0.952712836
227 Stephens, Chase JR Northwestern 28 100 Free 0.948539638
228 Kron, Kristian FR Univ of Utah 28 200 Back 0.947746698
229 Roberts, Cody SR UNLV (M) 28 100 Fly 0.945836009
230 Schwab, Nicholas SR Indiana 29 500 Free 0.960958639
231 Brown, Austin SR California 29 200 Fly 0.960473554
232 Wilimovsky, Jordan FR Northwestern… Read more »

ole 99
Reply to  ole 99
11 years ago

Forget that last post… user error with the model on my part. The tie remains

222 (28) Colley, Ben UNC 28 200 Fly 0.961483322
223 (28) Brumm, Pete Michigan 28 200 IM 0.956774255
224 (28) Hurley, Mike Indiana 28 100 Breast 0.953863466
225 (28) Frank, Simon Texas A&M 28 400 IM 0.952712836
226 (28) Stephens, Chase Northwestern 28 100 Free 0.948539638
227 (28) Kron, Kristian Univ of Utah 28 200 Back 0.947746698
228 (28) Roberts, Cody UNLV (M) 28 100 Fly 0.945836009
229 (29) Schwab, Nicholas Indiana 29 500 Free 0.960958639
230 (29) Brown, Austin California 29 200 Fly 0.960473554
231 (29) Wilimovsky, Jordan Northwestern 29 1650 Free 0.956825052
232… Read more »

c'mon now
11 years ago

You wouldn’t be using good judgement if you underestimate Cal and Durden. They have outperformed every other team at the biggest meet of the year for 3 straight years (yes, even when they were 2nd in 2010). Yes, they have some slight holes. But to assume Michigan is going to put it together at NC’s (when Bottom has clearly never done this) is silly. Until Cal flops at the meet, I wouldn’t bet against them.

M_FAN
Reply to  c'mon now
11 years ago

Yes, Cal will be a lot faster… and they are probably the favorite for this meet (given they are the defending champs). Michigan usually swims about the same speed that they do at their conference. But this is a completely different Michigan team from years past. They are faster from top to bottom. I wouldn’t under estimate Michigan. This is going to be a battle for first.

jeantuehl
11 years ago

Unfortunately I agree with COACH. As an IU guy, it will be sickening to have Michigan win this thing. Cal has made a couple miscalculations in this new NCAA format. Gimondi is now a relay only swimmer on top of their best sprinter Messerschmitt being ineligible all together. Fleming and Stubblefield luckily sneak in with a couple saves at PAC 12 in the dicey 50 or they would have been relay-only as well.

If the NCAA title comes down to the last 400 free relay, forget about it. Michigan wins. Utah just smoked Cal in that relay, and speaking of Tom Shields, that Utah lead-off swimmer is from Shields hometown. The vibes don’t look good for Cal IMO. Go IU… Read more »

Coach
Reply to  jeantuehl
11 years ago

They could have cared less about the 400 FR at Pac-12’s. just trying to put the finishing touches on a historic win. Still, I think it’s a lot asking Pebley, Prenot, Tarczinski, and Hoyt all to have amazing meets at the same time ….

Speaking of IU, I see them in the top 7, especially if Wells and Schmuhl brig their A game

M_FAN
Reply to  jeantuehl
11 years ago

Cal didn’t fully taper all their swimmers for PAC12s. Michigan did for Big 10s (except some of their distance guys). Cal will be a lot faster at NCAAs… the question is if they will be as fast as Michigan once fully rested and if Michigan will swim as fast as they did at Big 10s.

Coach
11 years ago

Somebody try to convince me that Michigan won’t win this thing. I’m not seeing anybody that can step up and beat them. Lots of depth AND quality. I’m a huge Durden fan but even he can’t pull this off, although me tommy shields will be the swimmer of the meet.

Morgan Priestley
Reply to  Coach
11 years ago

Remember when nobody picked Cal to finish higher than 4th last year before NCAAs?

dranms
11 years ago

Gimondi swam in two last chance meets. The first one was just before the start of Pac-12s in Federal Way. Then he went to the one in Georgia. I believe NCAA rules state that you are only allowed to go to one (or at least only able to count times from the first one).

Aquamom2016
Reply to  Braden Keith
11 years ago

Karma has a way of coming back around to haunt you, particularly when you do something that you know is just plain wrong – Cal most certainly has positioned themselves to get smacked with just that.

Duckduckgoose
Reply to  Aquamom2016
11 years ago

Fabio’s the victim of an esoteric/obscure rule. Please enlighten us all on the myriad ways Durden and/or Cal are dirty? Sincere thanks.

What's the verdict?
11 years ago

Any news on the situation with Fabio Gimondi? Is he in?

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »