Sam Short Becomes First Australian Man to Win 200, 400, 800, 1500 Freestyle Since Hackett in 2005

2026 AUSTRALIAN SWIMMING TRIALS

On Friday, Sam Short won the 1500 freestyle, his 4th and final event of the 2026 Australian Swimming Trials. This was not only his 4th event of the meet, but was also his 4th event win of the meet, marking a clean sweep of the 200, 400, 800, and 1500 freestyle events. With this win, he becomes the first man since Grant Hackett in 2005 to accomplish this feat.

On top of sweeping the distance events, Short also set a new textile world record in the 800 freestyle, stopping the clock in 7:36.73 to become the fastest male swimmer since the end of the super suit era in 2009.

He also set the 5th fastest time in history in the men’s 400 freestyle of 3:40.67, picking up the fastest time in the world this season, and moved up to #4 this season in the 1500 and #6 in the world this season in the 200.

Short posted about his meet on Instagram, revealing that he has shifted his focus events recently with the 1500 outside his target these days, and he said it was “good to see” that he’s still “got it”. This shift is clearly working well for Short, as even without his full focus on the event, he still set one of the top times in the world this year.

 

Short is the latest in a long line of Australian freestylers that have long been at the top of the world rankings, and he seemed like the heir apparent to the Australian freestyle throne. Hackett was the most in-line with Short’s events, and won the 400, 800, and 1500 freestyle at the 2005 World Championships, the same summer he won all four events at the Australian Trials.

Ian Thorpe is another Australian freestyle legend, though he focused more on the middle-distance events of the 200 and 400 free, but is widely regarded as one of the best, if not the best, male middle distance freestylers of all time.

Most recently, the Aussies had Mack Horton filling those shoes, winning Olympic gold in the 400 freestyle back in 2016, along with a host of other medals in the 800 and 1500 freestyle events during his senior career.

Short’s performance at this meet feels like it has been a long time coming for those familiar with his journey. At the World Championships in 2023, Short won the 400 freestyle in a time of 3:40.68. He also won the silver medal in the 800 free (7:37.76) and the bronze medal in the 1500 free (14:37.28). All three of those swims were his lifetime best times until this weekend.

In 2024, Short finished 2nd in the 400 and 800 freestyle at the Australian Trials and had to scratch the 1500 due to illness. He was still able to participate in all three events at the Games, but his highest finish was 4th in the 400 freestyle (3:42.64) and he failed to make the 800 (7:46.83) or 1500 (14:58.15) final entirely.

Later, Short called the performance a “failure”, stating “A combination of illnesses and injuries ultimately derailed my year heading into trials and the games [sic]”. He also said he would be taking a long break to undergo shoulder rehab before the 2025 season.

At the 2025 Trials, Short won the 400 (3:41.03), 800 (7:40.95), and 1500 (14:52.43) freestyle events, all with times faster than he swam at the 2024 Olympics, and he seemed primed to return to his 2023 form at the 2025 World Championships.

In Singapore, however, Short became one of the victims of the infamous “illness” that spread around the meet, which led to him scratching the 800 free final after he finished 2nd in the prelims. He still raced the 400 free, finishing 2nd in 3:42.37, and the 1500 free, finishing 4th in 14:43.08, but these swims were still not up to the standard many expected to see from him.

With his breakthrough at the Australian Trials this year, there will be a lot of eyes on him for the Commonwealth Games and the Pan-Pacific Championships as he tries to stay healthy and potentially break a few world records.

In This Story

30
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

30 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Khachaturian
19 days ago

7:35 incoming

MigBike
20 days ago

Not too fast at the important events though – The 50 and 100.

McIntosh-Marchand
Reply to  MigBike
19 days ago

Is Bobby Finke swimming 21 and 47?

Last edited 19 days ago by McIntosh-Marchand
Prop
Reply to  McIntosh-Marchand
19 days ago

Bobby who

64x25m.
Reply to  Prop
19 days ago

Hello Prop.

Welcome to SwimSwam.

Bibby Finke is a triple Olympic Gold Medallist, and he is also the WR holder at 1500m.

I’m glad that I could help.

Let me know if you have any other questions.

Please remember your sunscreen for your Everybody Welcome splashabout today.

Sincerely,
64x25m.

STRAIGHTBLACKLINE
20 days ago

I’d love to see the time comparisons. Short was definitely faster in the 200/400/800 but I think Hackett’s 2005 time in the 1500 might have been faster.

Mr Piano
Reply to  STRAIGHTBLACKLINE
20 days ago

Hackett was 14:44 at the trials and 14:42.58 at the worlds.

His PB of course was 14:34.56 from Fukuoka.

Andy
Reply to  Mr Piano
19 days ago

Yeah Hackett’s peak swimming year was 2001. It’s just it coincided with Thorpe’s peak year, which overshadowed how amazing it actually was.

Hackett’s 2001 times:

200 – 1:46.1 leading off the relay (more than 2s faster than any other lead off, and faster than every flying leg bar Thorpe, Klete Keller anchored USA in 1:47.5)
400 – 3:42.5 (2.6s faster than bronze)
800 – 7:40.3 (almost 11s faster than bronze)
1500 – 14:34.5 (24.5s faster than silver and the ONLY WR to survive the super suit era)

He improved his PB’s slightly to 1:45.84 at 2002 Pan Pacs and 7:38.65 (WR) at 2005 Worlds but 25 years on, his Fukuoka performances remain incredible

For comparison,… Read more »

Mr Piano
Reply to  Andy
19 days ago

Thing is, sprinting has changed it’s training a lot since the early 2000s in a way distance hasn’t, or I should say it’s been more optimized since the 2000s.

No doubt Hackett was one of the greatest freestylers ever, but if 2001 Ervin was swimming today he’d be waaaay faster.

I mean he basically proved that by going 21.40 in the 50 free with modern suits and training as a 35 year old haha.

Last edited 19 days ago by Mr Piano
Mr Piano
Reply to  Mr Piano
19 days ago

How is this controversial? Do you guys really believe that swim inflation has not been a thing?

Not saying that it didn’t exist for distance swimming either, Hackett totally would be dominating today, all I’m saying is that Hoogenband’s 47.84 from Sydney is just as impressive as a 46 today.

Ervin would absolutely be finaling in the 50/100 if he was born 2 decades later.

Last edited 19 days ago by Mr Piano
Just Keep Swimming
Reply to  Mr Piano
19 days ago

You’re getting downvoted because what you’re saying:

1. Doesn’t make sense;
2. Is objectively wrong; and
3. An attempt to inexplicably promote Adrian in a post that has nothing to do with him and use that to discredit Hackett?

Like you quite literally say Hackett’s swims aren’t as impressive despite the fact they still would be winning medals. Then saying that Adrian’s swims, which are nowhere near the current best, actually would be winning.

Then you make a nonsense strawman to defend it. “Wow you don’t believe in simulation”?

You’re just making a nonsense claim of “Adrian would definitely still be competitive if he was born later”. You could literally make that claim about anyone.

I could… Read more »

Mr Piano
Reply to  Just Keep Swimming
18 days ago

1. What doesn’t make sense to you? That swimmers today swim faster because of better training, tech suits, and advancements in the sport? Do you think that Michael Andrew is a better 50 freestyler than Tom Jager and Matt Biondi?

He’s gone 21.41 while Biondi and Jager went 21.8 in a practice suit, no underwaters, off of blocks that were like 2 feet long, and in an era 35 years removed in sprint training and knowledge. Perhaps there’s some nuance here.

2. Anthony Ervin objectively went 21.40 in the 50 free at the 2016 Olympics. That is much faster than the 22.0 and 21.98 he swam at the 2001 worlds and 2000 Olympics that was at the time, the… Read more »

SwimGB
20 days ago

This guy flunks at the big dance

Mr Piano
Reply to  SwimGB
20 days ago

He’s won 4 individual medals at the world championships. One of them gold.

Why is Wiffen at CAL.
Reply to  Mr Piano
19 days ago

Thats not the big dance

McIntosh-Marchand
Reply to  Why is Wiffen at CAL.
19 days ago

You know that he was ill and injured before Paris, right?

Or I can give you a very loooong list of great swimmers who never won individual Olympic gold or no Olympics medal at all.

World Championship (LC) and Olympic are the big dance

They’re the major swimming events.

Steve Nolan
Reply to  McIntosh-Marchand
19 days ago

I mean, they’re nowhere near equal tho. For actual fans the difference isn’t as wide as short course WCs to long course WCs, but for casuals it might as well be.

McIntosh-Marchand
Reply to  Steve Nolan
18 days ago

So, this means Jenny Thompson flunked the big dance since she never won Olympic individual gold.

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  Why is Wiffen at CAL.
19 days ago

You must be from Kiribati the way you’re always posting goofy comments

McIntosh-Marchand
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
19 days ago

comment image

McIntosh-Marchand
Reply to  SwimGB
20 days ago

He was injured and had illness before Paris, disrupting his training.

He had gastroenteritis (thanks to American swimmers who spread the disease) during Singapore, and yet she won 400 silver and a respectable 14:43 in 1500, but he had to scratch 800, the event where he was a favorite to win.

How can you say he flunks at the big dance when he was healthy in 2023 Fukuoka and won 400 gold, 800 silver, and 1500 bronze.

Last edited 20 days ago by McIntosh-Marchand
Robbos
Reply to  McIntosh-Marchand
19 days ago

Only Americans are allowed excuses, Simone and Dressel or illnesses American swimmers, if Aussies dont win they choke.

McIntosh-Marchand
Reply to  Robbos
18 days ago

Exactly.

All American swimmers were ill in Singapore.

None of non- American swimmers were in ill in Singapore, even if they caught the bug from American swimmers.

It’s in line with the logic of their president.

64x25m.
Reply to  McIntosh-Marchand
18 days ago

Logic? 😂

popvicioverpan
20 days ago

I don’t know about a few… maybe the 400 free, but the 800, 200, and 1500 are HIGHLY unlikely.

McIntosh-Marchand
Reply to  popvicioverpan
20 days ago

He (or no one else in the next decade for that matter) won’t break 800 WR

But at least Short broke 800 textile WR

Eduardo
Reply to  McIntosh-Marchand
19 days ago

Chance of breaking textile 200 record?

McIntosh-Marchand
Reply to  Eduardo
19 days ago

Zero, he doesn’t have the speed.

200 free is basically a longer sprint.

Doe
Reply to  Eduardo
19 days ago

He literally went out in a PB 100 free on his 1.45 from this week, 51.4

McIntosh-Marchand
Reply to  Doe
19 days ago

51 PB gives you 1:45. The OP asked if he could break 200 textile record, which is 1:42.97

He has to be able to swim low 48 100 free to have any chance to swim sub 1:43 200 free.

Thorpe had 48.5 and 3:40 PB (likely 3:39 in that swim if he had now slowed down) and his 200 PB is 1:44.0

Last edited 19 days ago by McIntosh-Marchand