Report Says USA Swimming Has Ignored Hundreds Of Sexual Abuse Cases

A report by the Southern California News Group says USA Swimming has ignored, covered up or refused to investigate sexual abuse allegations against coaches in relation to hundreds of swimmers over decades.

The SCNG report is extensive, and you can read it in its entirety on the website of The Orange County Register here. Much of it implicates former CEO Chuck Wielguswho has been widely criticized for USA Swimming’s handling of sexual abuse claims under his leadership, but the report also points fingers at other officials still in place.

A few of the biggest key allegations raised in the SCNG report:

  • That “top USA Swimming executives, board members, top officials and coaches” knew about sexually predatory coaches for years, but did not pursue any action against them. The report cites multiple high-profile cases, including Rick Curl and Mitch Ivey.
  • That USA Swimming has paid $77,627 to lobbying firms to lobby against California legislation that would make it easier for sexual abuse victims to sue their abusers and organizations that employed them – which would include USA Swimming or USA Swimming clubs in the case of abusive coaches.
  • That USA Swimming keeps a list of “flagged” coaches and officials who have been arrested or accused by law enforcement of sex crimes but have not yet been disciplined by USA Swimming. The report says the “flagged” list is not available to the public, and that of 32 people on the flagged list in 2010, only six were ultimately banned by USA Swimming. This existence of this list has been known in the past, with the explanation that it is made up of known non-members that USA Swimming doesn’t have authority to ban until they apply for membership.

We asked USA Swimming about these allegations but have not yet received a response. When current CEO Tim Hinchey took over last summer, we interviewed him and asked what he thought about the criticism of Wielgus and how he would lead in the area of sexual abuse by coaches and officials. Hinchey said he “didn’t have a whole lot of knowledge” about the situation but would be getting up to speed with it as soon as he could. We’ve asked USA Swimming multiple times since then to speak with Hinchey about the issue, but have not received a response.

The SCNG report cites attorney Bob Allardwho has represented multiple victims of sexual abuse within the sport, and is currently representing Olympian Ariana Kukorswho says she was groomed and sexually abused from the age of 13 by her longtime coach Sean HutchisonAllard is calling for the immediate removal of all of USA Swimming’s executive leadership. That would include COO Mike UngerManaging Director Pat HoganExecutive Director Debbie HesseManaging Director Lindsay Mintenko and Safe Sport Director Susan Woessner.

The report also quotes Nancy Hogshead-Makar, an Olympic swimmer and outspoken advocate for women in sports. Hogshead-Makar says there are “still too many abusive coaches who are either still coaching [or] still in the Hall of Fame.” She also alleges that coaches have been “blackballed” for advocating for athletes and trying to push back against unethical coaches.

In another troubling piece of the report, Hogshead-Makar says she once asked Woessner why USA Swimming wasn’t looking into sexual misconduct allegations leveled at a former U.S. Olympic coach. Hogshead-Makar says Woessner asked “what does it matter?” because the coach in question was no longer coaching young swimmers.

The SCNG report alleges that USA Swimming has covered up abuse to protect its brand, quoting swim coach Dia Rianda calling Safe Sport “a complete farce.” Rianda – who says she reported inappropriate behavior by a coach and was ultimately fired for it – says that “USA Swimming is all about protecting their brand in any way they possibly can.”

Even more concerning are legal documents in which Wielgus seems to admit that protecting young swimmers has never been the organization’s top priority. The OCR report includes a 2010 deposition of Wielgus in which the former USA Swimming executive was asked if protecting young swimmers from sexual abuse was USA Swimming’s top goal. “No I would not,” Wielgus said. “… I would say that has never been our number one goal.”

The report also lists several major payments from USA Swimming to outside firms connected to sexual abuse allegations. The story says USA Swimming spent $7.45 million on legal fees between the years 2006 and 2016, a number nearly ten times what USA Track & Field paid over the same period. The story also tracks a six-figure payment to a Denver-based public relations firm specializing in “crisis communication” to help clubs deal with sexual abuse scandals. That’s in addition to the $77,000+ payment to a California lobbying firm to lobby against the legislation that would extend the statute of limitations, allowing abuse victims more time to take legal action against their abusers.

Another name that gets brought up in the report is that of Pat Hogan, USA Swimming’s club development managing director. According to a June 2010 deposition, Wielgus said Hogan was the USA Swimming employee with the most knowledge regarding the organization’s child protection program. In the same deposition, Wielgus was questioned about Hogan’s first wife, who began training for him at the age of 17. Hogan was 27. The two eventually began dating, later married and then divorced. Wielgus said he never questioned Hogan about his relationship with his first wife, but would only say the relationship “began to develop” after she was 18.

Hogan spoke on that relationship in a 2010 New York Times piece, saying both were adults when the relationship began. “I conducted myself with complete honor and integrity in my relationship with my former wife,” Hogan said in the Times. “Our relationship, which developed after she was 18 and I was a young man in my 20s, always had the full knowledge and blessing of her parents”

You can read the full OC Register report here.

37
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of
37 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
'Tis disturbing
3 years ago

And are we to be surprised? It is the secret that everyone knows or has already heard… When is it finally going to be addressed…properly?

PerpetualAutumn
3 years ago

Allard’s calls for resignation may be too broad. While some removals are long over due, people who have recently earned positions in the hopes of bringing about change shouldn’t be removed just for the effect it has on paper to make a clean sweep.

TELL THAT TOO....
Reply to  PerpetualAutumn
3 years ago

…the former USA Gymnastics Board, who ALL just had to resign in an effort to “start new”. Some of them had just been named to the Board to replace others that had recently resigned due to the Nassar fiasco.

Starting new, means Starting NEW. If there is someone already on the Board, who has impeccable credentials, they can re-apply and go through the “NEW” screening process to be instated on the “NEW” Board. Really simple.

Brian M
3 years ago

It’s all about protecting the cash cow. Ask yourself why both USA Swimming, Inc and USA Swimming Foundation have somewhere in the neighborhood of $50 million dollars in net assets when combined. Not to mention a payroll of $10 million, with $1 million of that going to the CEO. For those of you not in the business world, that is an insane payroll not only for a non-profit but for any business when you take into account the revenue generated. In my experience, people with a golden goose like that are going to do anything they can to not rock the boat.

Steve Nolan
Reply to  Brian M
3 years ago

I think I’ve posted this elsewhere, but this Real Sports segment on the USOC hoarding cash and not giving anything to athletes really got me worked up. It’s the same all throughout.

Sports are a really good racket, but not if ya play them.

Sir Swimsalot
3 years ago

Well this isn’t unsettling and disappointing in the slightest.*sarcasm

gonads12
3 years ago

The OCR report includes a 2010 deposition of Wielgus in which the former USA Swimming executive was asked if protecting young swimmers from sexual abuse was USA Swimming’s top goal. “No I would not,” Wielgus said. “… I would say that has never been our number one goal.”

that should have been the final nail on the coffin. what the hell is wrong with someone in his position allowing him to say that publically. everyone involved should have been fired or resigned

Steve Nolan
Reply to  gonads12
3 years ago

If the whole Russian Federation can get banned from the Olympics, I don’t know why the USA can’t, either.

Both countries were willing to excuse pretty much anything in the pursuit of winning.

Yozhik
Reply to  Steve Nolan
3 years ago

It’s not a very good analogy. Russian government invests into sport for political purposes to secure its own popularity. So the punishment for cheating in the sport at the government level was political by its nature and targeted interests of Russian government first of all.
Sexual abuse is much deeper moral issue that has been having different interpretation historically and culturally. You will surprise me very much if you point the example of some society in the human history where woman’s rights are completely protected in the area of sexual relationships.

Steve Nolan
Reply to  Yozhik
3 years ago

Exactly! What the US governing bodies have condoned is worse.

Yozhik
Reply to  Steve Nolan
3 years ago

Getting some country banned from the Olympics may help to make sport cleaner, but in no way it will stop practice of sexual abuse in sport.
The history knows only one example when such an issue was resolved with one decisive punishing act – Sodom and Gomorrah. But it is too violent by contemporary moral standards 😀

Steve Nolan
Reply to  Yozhik
3 years ago

What? Why would a ban for doping be effective but a ban for excusing sexual abuse not?

Sum Ting Wong
Reply to  Steve Nolan
3 years ago

I would much prefer to be given Meldonium morning noon & night than be forced to submit to sport sexual deviancy via coaches & medics .

In the case of USA Gym because it was sanctioned by the authorities & actual sexual abuse occured at Worlds & Olympics yes the team should be banned for 2 years. Throwing out board members is a nothingburger .

sven
Reply to  gonads12
3 years ago

I wish more people saw the world through your eyes, Gonads12.

Albert Spohn
Reply to  gonads12
2 years ago

I don’t see why his comment should be any kind of nail in a coffin. What he said in no way implies that protecting young swimmers from sexual predators wasn’t a high priority. It’s a ludicrous question. If they asked me, I’d say “Our top goal is to keep young swimmers from drowning.”

Sccoach
3 years ago

I hope ESPN Outside the Lines gets a hold of this

sane swim parent
Reply to  Sccoach
3 years ago

They did: http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=22503664
My vote for new CEO of USA Swimming is Nancy Hogshead Makar.

Sccoach
Reply to  sane swim parent
3 years ago

I saw the episode. I just wish they’d crush USA swimming for 2 weeks like they did with gymnastics. I’m a coach and love swimming but I’m just tired of hearing about this year after year. Everyone flagged and everyone who helped cover things up needs to get taken care of

MrsTarquinBiscuitbarrel
3 years ago

Not surprised. Lamentably.

BaldingEagle
3 years ago

This is something that http://www.swimswam.com has been reporting on for a while. Perhaps this reporting will bring the story to a wider audience. But sadly, this is all stuff that we have known and been reading about for a long time.

BTW, in case anyone is wondering: Rick Curl, who was sentenced to a seven-year stretch in Maryland, was released after serving only three years. Word is that he is doing well in the world outside of swimming. Coaches who know him have told others “it’s old news, it’s time to move on.” That dude lawyered-up really well if all he got was a 7 year sentence in the first place, and if he was released… Read more »

About Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson swam for nearly twenty years. Then, Jared Anderson stopped swimming and started writing about swimming. He's not sick of swimming yet. Swimming might be sick of him, though. Jared was a YMCA and high school swimmer in northern Minnesota, and spent his college years swimming breaststroke and occasionally pretending …

Read More »