Hubert Kos Shatters Mitch Larkin’s 200 SCM Back World Record, Goes 1:45.12

2025 WORLD AQUATICS SWIMMING WORLD CUP – Toronto

Men’s 200 Backstroke – Finals

Top 8 Finishers

  1. Hubert Kos (HUN)- 1:45.12 **New World Record
  2. Thomas Ceccon (ITA) 1:47.49
  3. Lorenzo Mora (ITA)- 1:50.32
  4. Tomoyuki Matsushita (JPN)- 1:50.53
  5. Enoch Robb (AUS)- 1:50.733
  6. Kacper Stokowski (CLB)- 1:50.99
  7. Joshua Edwards-Smith (AUS)- 1:51.10
  8. Yeziel Morales (PUR)- 1:51.56

Hubert Kos had won the 200 back at both of the previous stops this year, but without coming within a second of his own Hungarian record. At the final stop in Toronto, he went after the race with a vengeance.

Mitch Larkin‘s previous World Record in the event had stood since 2015, the year that the Australian won double gold at the long course World Championships, and was the second-oldest . His time of 1:45.63 had stood out of reach for most of the decade since, Evgeny Rylov the only man to come within a second until Hubert Kos‘ World Championship winning swim of 1:45.65 last December.

That put the Hungarian within a whisker of setting his first World Record, and he has clearly been targeting the World Cup Series this fall. He has set Hungarian Records in the 100 IM on three occasions so far, and swum phenomenal times in the 50 back (22.65), 100 back (48.78) and 200 back (1:46.84) through the Carmel and Westmont stops.

This could be just the first of some truly mesmerizing swims from the Texas-based swimmer, with the 100 IM still to come tonight before he swims the 50 back and 100 back on days 2 and 3 respectively.

Kos went out like a rocket in this race, his stroke rate high from the off. He flipped at the halfway mark in 51.60, just 0.25 seconds off World Record pace and a full 1.5 seconds faster than he went out last week in Westmont. Thomas Ceccon, his closest challenger, was nearly a second back at that point.

His lead only grew, and his fantastic underwaters told on the final two 50s. He kept all four 50’s under 27 seconds, a phenomenal achievement in an event that often sees swimmers fall away on the back end.

With 50 to go he was 0.27 seconds under Larkin’s pace, setting himself up for a huge final 50 where he took another quarter second out of the Australian, touching 0.51 seconds under the World Record in 1:45.12.

Split Comparison

Hubert Kos, 2024 – World Short Course Championships Mitch Larkin, 2015 – Short Course World Championships Hubert Kos, 2025 – World Cup, Toronto Stop
50 25.08 24.46 24.86
100 52.75 (27.67) 51.35 (26.89) 51.60 (26.74)
150 1:19.58 (26.83) 1:18.42 (27.07) 1:18.15 (26.55)
200 1:45.65 (26.07) 1:45.63 (27.21) 1:45.12 (26.97)

The big difference for Kos compared to his previous best was on the second 50. Where he was conserving energy back in Budapest in December, he pushed the pace this time around, splitting nearly a second faster. He was nine-tenths slower on the final 50, but was already 1.43 seconds up on his previous pace. More importantly, he was faster than Larkin on all except the first 50.

He is joined in the all-time top 10 by the second-place finisher tonight, Thomas Ceccon, who set a new Italian Record.

Top 10 Men’s SCM 200 Backstroke Performers All-Time

  1. Hubert Kos (HUN) – 1:45.12, 2025
  2. Mitch Larkin (AUS) – 1:45.63, 2015
  3. Arkady Vyatchanin (RUS) – 1:46.11, 2009
  4. Evgeny Rylov (RUS) – 1:46.37, 2020
  5. Ryan Lochte (USA) – 1:46.68, 2010
  6. George Du Rand (RSA) – 1:47.08, 2009
  7. Ryan Murphy (USA) – 1:47.34, 2018
  8. Radoslaw Kawecki (POL) – 1:47.38, 2014
  9. Thomas Ceccon (ITA) – 1:47.49, 2025
  10. Markus Rogan (AUT) – 1:47.64, 2009

Kos was more than 1.5 seconds faster than his season best in the event, and could throw down some serious swims later on this week. He was just 0.02 seconds off his Hungarian Record in the 100 back in Westmont a week ago, and 0.01 seconds off his best in the 50 back in Carmel a week before that. Both of those look in immense danger right now.

Kos won the first of what he will be hoping are three Triple Crowns with his victory here, taking the $10,000 bonus. With the Hungarian already leading the overall World Cup standings prior to this week, he looks the overwhelming favorite to take the series title.

In This Story

33
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

33 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Andy Hardt
7 months ago

Incredible new world record! No surprise to see Kos do it after he was so close last year.

I will be a bit sad, however, to see this record go. It always boggled my mind seeing it on every meet recap: the incredible quality of the record (to this day, only 5 swimmers have even broken 1:47); the fact that it was set in 2015, in many ways still part of the post-supersuit “dead period”; and the fact that while Larkin was a fantastic swimmer and regular medal contender, he was not one the giants of the sport (Phelps, Piersol, etc.), outside of a magical 6-month period in 2015.

Andre
7 months ago

I remember someone calling Milak’s fly “poetry”. I think he’s the equivalent in backstroke. It’s just a smooth, beautiful and killer backstroke, just “poetry”

Patra
Reply to  Andre
7 months ago

Hungarians are technicians.

EMG2020Transform
Reply to  Patra
7 months ago

Gurta was my reference for breaststroke

PFA
Reply to  Andre
7 months ago

Like with Phelps and Milak. Kos backstroke reminds me of Rosuke Irie’s backstroke stroke at his peak.

Last edited 7 months ago by PFA
FST
Reply to  PFA
7 months ago

Irie was just poetry in motion.

Swimmingly Sorry
Reply to  FST
7 months ago

Ryosuke Irie and Roland Matthes are just Kings of backstroke poetry.

EXCALIBUR
Reply to  Swimmingly Sorry
7 months ago

yep

snailSpace
7 months ago

Curious how he will go about that 100 back now. The WR has a very strong back-end, with perfect walls, unlikely to be replicated. If he wants it, I think he’s better off just pushing the first 50 and trying to hang on.

Miranda
7 months ago

Ha, in the poolside interview, he just casually threw out that maybe he’d be able to get the LC WR in Budapest 2027. Kos, this would be phenomenal to see. You better not be joking around about taking down a Supersuit WR. Would love to see him do it.

Swimmingly Sorry
Reply to  Miranda
7 months ago

I am a bit skeptical, but I hope he does it!

As a swimming fan, there’s nothing more satisfying than seeing a rubbersuit world record gets broken.

oxyswim
Reply to  Swimmingly Sorry
7 months ago

Lochte’s textile best seems super attainable at 1:52.96. It would take a Marchand-esque drop to get Piersol. I agree it seems like a bit of a long shot, but he’s been progressing very nicely in all 3 formats.

Miranda
Reply to  oxyswim
7 months ago

Yes. He was 1:53.19 at Worlds in July. And he said he was exhausted in that race. He’d already competed a lot of events. You wonder if he’s close if maybe Bob would let him do what Marchand did, and just drop all his other races to see how fast he could go in the 200M backstroke.

But yeah, that Lochte time definitely seems attainable.

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  Miranda
7 months ago

Did not realize 2027 Worlds are in Budapest. This is definitely the plan, getting Peirsol in 2027 at home

Swimmingly Sorry
7 months ago

Just as I predicted.

I think this is his best swimming ever.

1:45 is no joke at all

Dirtswimmer
Reply to  Swimmingly Sorry
7 months ago

I would put the 1:34.2 on the same level or potentially better, but he was more tapered and prepared there.

World Juniors > World Cup
Reply to  Dirtswimmer
7 months ago

Meters > Yards

maheny
Reply to  Dirtswimmer
7 months ago

you also would be wrong yea

Hmm
7 months ago

Mitch who?

Admin
Reply to  Hmm
7 months ago

Larkin – it’s there in the headline.

snailSpace
Reply to  Hmm
7 months ago

We ain’t hating on the great Mitch Larkin here.

Swimmerfromjapananduk
Reply to  Hmm
7 months ago

Casual

newbie
7 months ago

Every time I see him swim 200 back, I think about how he said that in his initial meeting with Bob before moving to ASU, he said he was a 2/4 IMer and Bob strongly encouraged him to start swimming 2 back instead (or maybe in addition), which he hadn’t really considered focusing on before.

Fast forward 3 years: Olympic gold medalist and SC WR holder!!! This race was so beautifully executed.

Emily Se-Bom Lee
Reply to  newbie
7 months ago

and the fastest lc time in a decade

Patra
Reply to  Emily Se-Bom Lee
7 months ago

I was just about to argue and then realized Larkin’s 1:53.17 was really a decade ago. That’s insane. It doesn’t feel like so long ago.

sjostrom stan
Reply to  newbie
7 months ago

Also just goes to show how Bob knows his swimmers better than they know themselves often

OldCoach
7 months ago

Hubi is swimming with a whole new level of confidence! Awesome to see!

ArtVanDeLegh10
Reply to  OldCoach
7 months ago

His time converts to 1:34.6, slower than what he went at NCAAs. So this isn’t really a surprise. The only surprise is that he did it in October which you wouldn’t think is his focus meet of the year.

Swimmingly Sorry
Reply to  ArtVanDeLegh10
7 months ago

Using Swimswam converter to make your argument is a bad move, and you see that everyone who understands elite swimming won’t support you.

Swimswam converter always give more advantage to SCY.

Breaking Mitch Larkin’s SCY 200 back is HUGE.

No one got close to it in the past 10 years.

This WR is better than anything Hubi has ever swum in SCY.

Last edited 7 months ago by Swimmingly Sorry
Swimmingly Sorry
Reply to  Swimmingly Sorry
7 months ago

“Breaking Mitch Larkin’s SCY 200 back is HUGE.”

I meant SCM 200 back.

ArtVanDeLegh10
Reply to  Swimmingly Sorry
7 months ago

I wasn’t surprised because:

1. I believe Kos is better than Larkin.
2. Kos is significantly faster than anyone else in SCY.
3. SCY and SCM are very similar unlike LCM.
4. He’s the best in the world.

It’s tough to make an argument that this WR is better than his SCY swim other than you just prefer SCM more.

Joel
Reply to  ArtVanDeLegh10
7 months ago

You obviously didn’t see Larkin swim live in 2015. It was beautiful to watch. He was on fire for an 8 month period.

OldCoach
Reply to  ArtVanDeLegh10
7 months ago

I never used the words “surprised”. I said it was “awesome”