7 Chris Morgan | August 14th, 2012 | Lifestyle, London 2012 Olympics, News

Now that the 2012 Olympics have ended and we have had some time to reflect on what was certainly something special, we ask ourselves some simple questions:

  • Was it the games we anticipated?
  • Will this truly be the end of the legend that is Michael?
  • Who will be the next superstar?
  • Will our sport grow without him?

To use a euphemism from the sport itself, when many swimmers pester their coaches during swim training to have the next set or to know the next send off interval, I ask this simple thing…what is the next lap?

In 1984, as a young and awkward teenager, I sat behind the only television in our home (a brown, cathode ray tube monstrosity that had 12 or so VHF channels and a bunch of less interesting UHF choices- fuzzy, and many in Spanish…). I was watching something that, at the time, I did not yet truly understand…something called the Olympic Games.

What do I remember about watching the games of Los Angeles? I remember the Opening Ceremony and watching a woman run the final lap of the torch relay—she happened to be the granddaughter of Jesse Owens (of course I knew his name, but not the significance). The torch was then handed off to the 1960 Olympic champion in the Decathlon. He stood at the upper archway of the LA Coliseum, raised the torch and lite the 5 Olympic Rings above his head, which in turn carried the flame to the Olympic cauldron. The image still brings chills to my skin.

I have been blessed with seeing every Olympiad on television or in person since 1984. Every “Games” has left its mark in the aquatic world we call swimming. Los Angeles gave us Rowdy Gaines and “The Albatross” Michael Gross from West Germany. 1988 in Seoul shined with Matt Biondi and a small 16 year old named Janet Evans. 1992 Barcelona brought us a historical moment when Pablo Morales claimed gold in the 100 Butterfly after failing to make the team in 1988, and a certain Alexander Popov from the Unified Team dethroned the American sprint kings. Atlanta 1996 was special in so many ways, the controversy of Michelle Smith and the continued success of the sprint Tsar Popov. However, the United States had some new names reaching the podiums and making headlines: Gary Hall Jr., Tom Dolan and the newest sweetheart of the US women’s team, Amanda Beard. 2000 games down under yeilded some guitar smashing and the “Thorpedo.” A tie in the 50m freestyle between Anthony Ervin and Gary Hall Jr. was a surprise and incredible moment for all. Dara Torres again made her mark on the 1st of two comebacks. Probably the most historically important occurrence at these Olympics was the participation of a 15 year-old boy finishing 5th in the 200 butterfly. Little did we know then…he would become a LEGEND! 2004 in Athens, 108 years after Pierre de Coubertain re-launched the modern games, a certain Michael Phelps would embark upon his historical path and completely own the Olympic spotlight. He won 6 gold and 2 bronze, but he wanted more. 2008 in Beijing: MP=8 Gold…enough said! That brings us to 2012. There was so much hype, there was so much expectation, there was so much to hope for: Phelps vs. Lochte, Missy and Magnussen who were both labeled as “missiles”, and could the French finally get it done?

Did the London Games disappoint? In my opinion…NOT AT ALL! It was simply AWESOME. It was for me why I have spent 28 years and 8 Olympic Games scrambling to record on VHS, flip through TV stations, look for Wi-Fi connections and nowadays DVR or TiVo, etc. One week of my life where only one thing matters…swimming!

What is the next thing for our sport? RIO? More from the “Missiles?” Michael goes for 23? I am not sure. What I can say is that our sport…swimming, is one of the greatest sports ever! We continue to anticipate every 4 years. Our other great non-aquatic athletes “tweet” about how they met Michael Phelps or how they admire the swimmers and how they work so hard—crazy to wake before the sun! We have shown that the technical suits were not so technical after all. World Records can be and will be broken. Unknown swimmers will dazzle us at the games- win events and lift their countries spirits. Of course there will be controversy; disqualifications due to technique failures or allegations and/or positive doping controls. Then the sun will rise and we are happy again with swimming.

What is next? What is the next lap? How about a 50 easy? Everyone likes that 🙂

Chris Morgan is a swimming coach in search of the next pool, the next set, and the most creative workouts. Follow him on Twitter @swim4chris

In This Story


  1. jacksoe says:

    I also feel like schmitty had a great olympics. Same number of medals in this olympics as missy and only one less gold. Anytime that you win an event (200 Free) by almost two full seconds in the olympics you deserve some credit.

  2. James says:

    One of the best stories posted on SwimSwam.

  3. john26 says:

    What was especially notable for these games, for me, was not the dominance of a single story line (as was the case for many of the examples you gave, ie MP as the overruling figure in 08), but for how unpredictable it was.

    For me day 1 had several storylines that looked like they could become the theme of the games

    1. Lochte’s “time”
    2. Chinese Dominance
    3. Aussie women’s relay victory setting the tone for Team Aus to exceed expectations at these games
    4. Kitajima’s becoming the first 3peat after Phelps crashing the 400IM.

    On day 2, two of those story lines were crushed within a single race, by one swimmer– Yannick Agnel who blows out Lochte and halts the Aussie sprint relay victory at one. Overnight, for some reason, Sun Yang is chosen by pundits as the marginal favorite for the 200free based on his top qualifying time and Thorpe-esque performance in the 400. (I still don’t understand how this was enough to make him considered the favorite, given that we all knew he was a distance guy with dreaded turns).

    Agnel backs up his form to win the 200free convincingly (a la ’08 Phelps), showing his relay heroism was no fluke and writes down his name as a the favorite for the 100free crown, and a signficant threat to the US 4x200free relay.

    5. Agnel, potentially the swimmer of the meet

    Additionally, Phelps was building steam after splitting 47.1 on the relay, suggesting he was back on form after placing out of the medals in the 400IM, heating up the 3peat prospect in the 200fly
    6. Phelps’ 3peat in the 200fly

    On Day 5 and 6, we saw both storyline 5 and 6 crumble. Phelps is upset by LeClos in style, Agnel fails to medal in a tumultuous 100free final that saw an unpredictable finishing order among the top 8. Lastly, the French relay failed to put up the expected challenge to the longer relay, allowing Phelps to finally get his first win.

    7 Phelps becomes GOAT

    ..which really is the only consistent theme for the remainder of the games. Storyline #2, for me buckled significantly after no female chinese relay even came close to medalling, and half their female stars (discounting Jiao, Lu Ying, Ye Shiwen, Tang Yi) made negative progress. This is something is nobody noticed because the team had an extraordinary showing on the first day, and Sun Yang closed the meet in a bang. Both swimmers produced the greatest swims of the meet, so there was no impression of underperformance of the team, although it lacked the stability of depth that the team had showed in the years leading up to the Olympics.

    Day 6, locked in storyline 7, as Lochte suffered his 2 loss of the day, and 3rd consecutive individual event– ending his Olympics and storyline #1 for good.

    Day 7, was the day I believe truly best summarizes the whole week of swimming.
    a) 200back. Missy Franklin shatters the WR–which made me aware of just how frail some of the suit WRs are. We saw 9 WRs in 8 events, which is far more than 90% of us imagined going in this. The times we saw would have been extremely optimistic predictions at the beginning of the week.

    b) Phelps sets his legacy in stone with two 3peats, however his times and performance suggests he has more to give and opens the door for a 4peat in Rio. There is room for regret in this event if he ever has the time to be nostalgic and reflect.

    c) It was fore-shadowed again and again and again and again earlier this meet with Meilutye, LeClos, Van der Burgh, Agnel… etc but never done so convincingly as Ledecky in the 800 in justifying what I think is the greatest storyline of the games:

    8. rise of young talent.

    In all these races, the times swum to victory were WORTHY winning times. In some races, I think the victory has luck playing a part, but Ledecky’s swim, because of how it was swum and how unexpected it was, was the most blatant billboard for the statement that there is a changing of the guards in our sport.

    d) Manaudou’s victory really supported 8, but also the number of upsets there were in these Olympics. I count 10/32 events had an extreme upset as the result, even going into the event. This is no where more evident in the 50free, where there was an Olympic Champion who was also the WR holder and World Champion by 0.4 seconds last year, but lost by an astonishing 0.25

    To me, #8 and the unpredictability of the Olympics– crushing of expected storylines give me the impression as the storyline of the games. However, this isn’t something that a non-swim fan would understand. Obviously, in 50 years, the only storyline people will remember is that this is the one Phelps became the GOAT…. Unless of course, one of these upsets that we saw this week will develop as the beginning of an athlete just a great.

    • morrow3 says:

      two thoughts
      1. I actually thought 10 WRs would fall – I was off by one – I really thought the m 200 IM would go. I always felt “the suit era” was being used as a crutch against being able to go fast.

      2. I think you might have missed 1-2 storylines in the lack-luster performance of the Aussies.
      Or the parity developing (YAY) in our sport.

  4. DanJohnRob says:

    Let’s just admit it! Without the US Swim Team, USA would not dominate the Olympics! Yes, the track athletes did better this time, the female gymnasts and tennis players impressed, we won an unexpected gold in diving and the wrestlers did well to win 2 golds; but, 16 out of 46 total gold medals and 31 out of 104 total medals was really impressive!
    And aside from the numbers, how about the wonderful, engaging, wholesome personalities of Missy Franklin, Nathan Adrian, Matt Grevers and Dana Vollmer, not to mention Ryan Lochte, Natalie Coughlin and Michael Phelps! If I were a parent choosing a sport for my child, I would strongly consider swimming with role-models like them. I only hope the USOC recognizes the great job US Swimming is doing and keeps their funding strong so we can all enjoy a repeat of this amazing performance in Rio!

  5. Lane Four says:

    Love the article!

Leave a Reply

Name will be published. Email address will not. By commenting you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy.

About Chris Morgan

Chris Morgan has just recently moved back to the United States after a successful 14 year coaching carreer in Europe, primarily in Switzerland. Chris is currently the assistant coach at Harvard University working with the women's swimming and diving team. Chris began his career at Stanford University learning from one …

Read More »