The NCAA May Have Secured a Commitment for Linear Television for Swimming & Diving Next Season

In spite of the uproar about the new NCAA Championship format the over the last 10 days, college swimming & diving administrators are privately telling coaches that they believe that they have secured a commitment from ESPN to air at least one day of next year’s NCAA Swimming & Diving Championships live on linear television*.

*(aka traditional television, ESPN/ESPN 2/ESPN U/etc.)

Members of the NCAA Swimming & Diving Committee told SwimSwam that they were not able to comment on those reports yet.

While the CSCAA put out a public statement earlier this week acknowledging the public response and saying that the format will “require adjustment,” decision makers are still privately celebrating the success of the new format.

Analysis

Via multiple conversations over the last few days, I believe I better understand the disconnect between the folks making the decisions and the general public, coaches, and swimmers.

As one coach put it so eloquently: “they’re building a meet for TV, not for live stream.”

What that means is this: all those gaps in the current format kill the energy and momentum of the meet for now. And while the hoi polloi sees it as dead air, TV people don’t need to actually see those gaps filled to understand what goes there.

I think that this is what Drew Johansen meant when he said in an editorial earlier this week that “this broadcast now serves as a proof of concept that we can present to networks to market our product and strengthen our position within our universities, conferences, and the NCAA.”

On a livestream, that’s dead air, or filled awkwardly with old races from past NCAA Championship meets like it was last year.

In a proper linear television broadcast, that ‘dead air’ is filled with interviews and engaging human interest pieces. The kind that we’ve all become so used to in televised sports that we don’t necessarily pause and think about the time that has passed.

And I see it.

But I still think you could run B-Finals during those breaks to create a better environment in the building. As the format is, and with Georgia Tech not allowing re-entries, there are reports of parents of certain teams leaving the venue for tailgating during the long breaks, and buying new tickets to get back in for the rest of the session.

I still think you could tighten up the timeline a little bit.

I appreciate the attempts to improve the format. We all asked for that, and we got it. I appreciate the vision. And if you appreciate those things, you should make sure you tell those folks what you appreciate.

But that doesn’t mean the product is ‘right’ yet. All of the stakeholders have to be considered. The revenue from ticket sales at the NCAA Championships is not insignificant. A full meet pulls in $350,000+ in ticket revenue, plus parking and concessions and all of the other economic drivers that go with it.

The sport has to find new fans to thrive. But the middle ground is I think what is being ignored. There are a lot of ex-swimmers who are not swim fans. They don’t follow the sport while they compete, or once they stop competing, or either. I think if we can figure out how to capture those people, then we have a real market and a good foundation to build off to go find the new-to-the-sport audience.

 

36
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

36 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
kilo0311
2 months ago

Braden, I appreciate your trying to straddle the fence, but come on…the “hoi polloi” sees gaps as dead air, but the vaunted “TV people” (and you) have the amazing capacity to see what it’s filled with? Really? So the meet needed to be destroyed in order for the ‘Pros from Dover’ to see that one could fill “dead air” with “interviews” and “engaging human interest stories”? Did you see the playback of the women’s meet? Is that what we’ll get in the future?

They made very poor format decisions, they need to hear that loud and clear, and that message should not be diluted with “thanks so much for the effort, we’re really excited about your making more changes for… Read more »

kilo0311
2 months ago

ok

Last edited 2 months ago by kilo0311
LCM
2 months ago

We just saw one of the greatest sports battles ever in the 1650 last night. Sports Fans around the world need to see this battle. And, Both athletes(Ahmed and Zalan) deserve TV exposure for delivering this UnReal performance. This stuff needs to be on prime television.

thezwimmer
2 months ago

I know radically changing the timeline of the season (NCAAs in December or February) was part of initial discussions, but have we thought simply of shifting to the earlier part of the week? Round of 32 games ended on Sunday and Sweet 16 games do not begin until tonight (Thursday). Seems like the beginning of the week could be a good time filler. I watched a pillow-fighting event of one of the ESPN networks on Tuesday. It was horribly boring, yet it was on TV.

With the current event order, what if we stream Day 0 on Sunday (since it’s only a shorter session). Then finals on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday evening since they aren’t directly competing with basketball.

Yes,… Read more »

Not a competitive swimmer
Reply to  thezwimmer
2 months ago

This seems like a strong idea, though it may result in fewer people in the stands.

2Fat4Speed
2 months ago

If they want to show human interest pieces so badly, couldn’t they be shown during the B-finals? I’d rather watch the B-finals, but at least 9-16 get to swim again.

Dan
Reply to  2Fat4Speed
2 months ago

The ‘commercial breaks’ last week(end) were almost 3 min long and most B-Finals are that long.

Swim Fan
2 months ago

Will the NCAA need to reschedule the swimming championship week to secure a live linear broadcast? ESPN’s March programming is focused on live basketball.

Swim Fan
2 months ago

Oh Boy… One day. What, ESPN couldn’t preempt cornhole, darts, and kickball for the NCAAs? Catering to woke ESPN isn’t going to help grow the sport of swimming!!!

Olympic sports are going to suffer over the next decade! Prove me wrong.

Dan
Reply to  Swim Fan
2 months ago

Maybe ESPN have done some of these things for a reason (not sure what)? Number of households with ESPN and ESPNU are down 70/50% over the last 10 years.

taa
Reply to  Dan
2 months ago

I refuse to give money to disney. That and I have a superbox.

Texan
Reply to  Swim Fan
2 months ago

One, ESPN pays a lot of money to the NCAA for the rights to all of the D1 championships. It’s not like swimming and diving is a separate package. Football playoff is a package. Men’s basketball is a package, I don’t believe women’s basketball is it’s own package yet but that may be coming, and then all the other sports are in one package. It’s just hours of content at that point. No one is trying to wrestle two swim meets away from that package, but if anyone ponied up enough money to do it, I’m sure ESPN would sell it to them.

ESPN has the two biggest weeks of content in the women’s basketball tourney during swimming NCAAs.… Read more »

Go Bears
2 months ago

Is that Patrick Murphy (Ryan’s brother) in the picture? What a pull from the archives.

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  Go Bears
2 months ago

and his mom to the right

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »