Swimming is A Team Sport: Why USA Always Wins the Duel in the Pool

With this past weekend’s throttling of the European All-Stars, Team USA moves to 7-0 all time in the international dual meet extravaganza. The first three victories came against Australia, who briefly challenged the US around the Sydney Olympics for world dominance.

The next four victories have come against a team from Europe, and given the bounty of talent in European swimming at the moment, it’s somewhat unbelievable that they haven’t won a single time. To be fair, they brought the meet down to the wire in 2013, where a 200 medley relay tie-breaker was used to decide the final outcome.

In 2015, it was back to business as usual, with team USA bruising Europe once again to the tune of 155-107 score. While there were highlights for Europe here and there, I can’t help but be struck by the amount of races Europe should have won but didn’t.

The key to understanding this, especially for American audiences, is to realize that America is the country in the world where swimming is least individual. Nearly every swimmer on the American squad has a lot of experience swimming dual meets, stepping up and competing as a team.

In fact, the exceptional performers on the European squad in this meet can be traced back to some good old American team swimming. It’s easy to forget as she’s criss-crossing the globe and hoovering up prize money, but Katinka Hosszu swam at USC and continues to be trained by an American coach.

Let’s look at a few examples from the first day of the competition:

  • Ryan Lochte‘s 400 IM- You could argue it takes little courage to win an event you are the world record holder in, on the other hand he has basically abandoned this event internationally at 31 years old. Had Hungarian David Verraszto been able to match his time from Netanya (4:02.43), he could have won the race.
  • Simone Manuel‘s 100 Free- Yes, Simone Manuel swam great in this race, but frankly Ranomi Kromowidjojo choked under pressure. She would go on to tie her own world record later in the meet, after the meet was a foregone conclusion, so you would think she could have easily come closer to her best in the 100 and outlasted the big swim from Manuel.
  • Melanie Margalis‘ 200 breast- If you were setting odds for Melanie Margalis to beat Yuliya Efimova heads up in a 200 breaststroke race, how much of an underdog would Margalis be? 5-1? 10-1? Coming into this race Efimova had a PB of 2:18 and Margalis sat at 2:23.
  • Cody Miller‘s 200 breast- Once again, non-Hosszu Hungarians were awful in this meet, and a hungry American swimmer was happy to seize the day. Daniel Gyurta is the world record holder and although he appeared a bit off in Netanya, still should have dispatched a swimmer like Miller easily. Instead, Miller stepped up and Gyurta stepped down and the rest was history.

Folks, that’s four great examples in just the first handful of events. Look at this meet’s results and you’ll find plenty more. It should hearten fans of American swimming to see this as we approach Rio.

It can be easy at this point in the Olympic cycle to get nervous about Team USA. After a lackluster performance in Kazan, with the Chinese surging, Australia seems to be gaining momentum at the same time.

I’ve given in to this panic before, but this time I’m staying faithful in the Stars and Stripes. The team we will send to Rio will have a huge advantage over every other country, the same advantage they’ve had for years. They will be a TEAM.

In This Story

40
Leave a Reply

16 Comment threads
24 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
27 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
G3

MURICA!!!

Steve-O Nolan

I dunno, man. I’d just chalk it up to being an exhibition meet where maybe the American team takes it more seriously. Tryna make it seem like we’ve just got some “killer instinct!” or “team mentality!” seems tough. Maybe we just swim faster because we’ve got faster swimmers.

The Grand Inquisitor

This article is inane or delusional, not sure which.

You completely lost me with gems like “Ranomi Kromowidjojo choked under pressure.” Do you mean the Olympic Champion in the 50 Free and 100 Free Ranomi Kromowidjojo? What we should possibly know about performing under real pressure? Please just stop.

Billabong

She said in her post swim interview that she was suffering from jet lag on the first day when she swam the 100m free. Why is that not in the article…….it’s right there on the SS website. She felt better the next day and swam a WR. That doesn’t look like a choke.

Sasz

.. or maybe because in that same weekend there was the Amsterdam Swim Cup where many good European swimmers were participating to qualify for Rio? Just a thought.

coacherik

The same could be said for the best USA swimmers not at the Duel in the Pool?

CM

It’s still one country versus an entire continent, not really a valid excuse

mcgillrocks

It’s not as though the Americans weren’t missing anyone (*cough* Ledecky *cough* Phelps. Yes Phelps. He might not be Tom Shields, but if Missy can score points in short course with her turns, than Phelps can score points in short course). And besides, if you want to really compare the United States and Europe, you can look at Olympic Results: 2008- US: 9 Golds / 25 medals (excluding relays & open water) Euros: 6 / 24 medals 2012- US: 12 / 24 Euros: 7 / 20 And I do point out that Europeans can enter a dozen competitors in each event, while the United States is limited to only two. If the US could enter 3 or 4 it’s likely… Read more »

BeeGees

If Europe was allowed to compete as one country in Olympics, they would win more golds than USA. Why? 1. They would still retain the same number of individual golds 2. They would sweep all relay golds, thus increasing their total golds while reducing USA’s gold tally. The only relay gold they might not win is w4x100 free Just imagine these relay compositions: W4x100 free: Sjostrom – Kromowidjojo – Heemskerk – SMOC (there’s a chance they’d lose to Australia) w4x200 free: Sjostrom – Heemskerk – Pellegrini – Hosszu (This relay would destroy the mighty USA) w4x100 medley: Hosszu/Nielsen – Efimova – Sjostrom – Kromowidjojo/Heemskerk m4x100 free: Morozov – Gilot – Magnini – Sukhorukov/Gilot/Orsi/Stravius m4x200 free: Guy – Biedermann – Verschuren… Read more »

mcgillrocks

You realize there are relays at Duel in the pool?

And the United States tends to win a lot of them. Of course, we get back to the old problem of who is bringing the better squad, but the fact is neither side is at full strength. Still, I don’t see why you would assume that Europe would suddenly smash the United States as a continent at the Olympics.

Wouldn’t such an advantage show up either a) at the duel in the pool, where the US swims relays against Europe or b) if Europe is so dominating at the Olympic Games, then why doesn’t it show up in their inferior medal counts?

mcgillrocks

To prove my point, consider 2012. Europe obviously gets the two 400 free relays, because European countries won them. However, this is how is stacks up if you take the best European in each leg to make the hypothetical Euro-Stars relays. Women’s 800 free USA- 7:42.92 (TWR, OR) Europe 1:55.51 (Muffat, fastest leadoff) 1:56.15 (Balmy) 1:57.39 (Turner) 1:57.61 (Pellegrini) Total: 7:46.66 *Sjostrom probably could have helped, but she would have had to be 1:53 something, which we just can’t assume, especially given her shape at the time* Winner: United States of America (Europe would have finished just behind Australia for bronze) Women’s 400 medley USA- 3:52.05 (WR) Europe 59.13 (Zuyeva) 1:04.98 (Efimova) 56.83 (Ottesen) 52.91 (Kromowidjojo) Total: 3:53.85 *Granted, Ruta… Read more »

About Chris DeSantis

Chris DeSantis

Chris DeSantis is a swim coach, writer and swimming enthusiast. Chris does private consulting and coaching with teams and individuals. You can find him at www.facebook.com/cdswimcoach. Chris is a 2009 Graduate from the Masters of Applied Positive Psychology program at the University of Pennsylvania. He was the first professional athletic coach …

Read More »

Don't want to miss anything?

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest updates!