Lifintsev’s 51.78 Back and Prigoda’s 57.56 Made NAB Uncatchable (Day 4 Relay Analysis)

by Mark Wild 13

July 30th, 2025 International, News

2025 World Championships

MIXED 4X100 MEDLEY RELAY – FINAL

  • World Record: 3:37.43, United States – 2024
  • World Junior Record: 3:44.84, United States – 2019
  • Championship Record: 3:38.56, United States – 2017
  • 2023 World Champion: China, 3:38.57
  • 2024 Olympic Champion: United States, 3:37.43
  1. Neutral Athletes B, 3:37.97
  2. China, 3:39.99
  3. Canada, 3:40.90
  4. Netherlands, 3:40.97
  5. Australia, 3:41.02
  6. Italy, 3:42.19
  7. Japan, 3:44.15
  8. Poland, 3:44.27

With three of the Olympic finalists missing from the final, led by the absence of the world record holder and Olympic Champions, the United States, this relay was bound to be a topsy turvey event, but in fact, at least for the winners, it was rather straight forward as the Neutral Athlete B Team, comprised of swimmers from the Russian Federation, built such a lead on the front two legs that no one could run them down. Their winning time of 3:37.97, was clear of the field by over two seconds and clocks in as the 4th fastest performance of all time.

Backstroke Leg

Rank Swimmer Country Time (Place)
1 Miron Lifintsev Neutral Athletes 51.78 (1)
2 Christian Bacico Italy 52.78 (2)
3 Ksawery Masiuk Poland 53.19 (3)
4 Xu Jiayu China 53.23 (4)
5 Riku Matsuyama Japan 54.01 (5)
6 Kai van Westering Netherlands 54.03 (6)
7 Kaylee McKeown Australia 57.65 (7)
8 Kylie Masse Canada 58.69 (8)

You can read more about Miron Lifintsev‘s swim here, but the 20-year-old blew away the competition and gave his team a lead that was never in danger of being relinquished. After placing 7th in the individual event with a time of 52.51, the  Junior World Record Holder, blasted out to the front in 24.60 and closed in 27.18, splitting 51.78. His time not only would have won the individual 100 backstroke event, but it could become the 2nd fastest performance ever, pending verification.

In relation to this relay, the Italians opted not to use Thomas Ceccon, the World record holder and winner of the silver medal in the event. Christian Bacico was 52.68 this morning and was just a tenth slower this evening, but with Lifintsev a full second faster and in an outside lane the NAB team had clean water to both sides.

Only two teams opted for a female backstroker, with the winner of the 100 back, Kaylee McKeown, opening things off for the Australians, and Kylie Masse, who placed 4th in the individual event, kicking things off for the Canadians. The pair, both former WR holders in the 100 back, were a little slower than their times earlier in the week, with the Aussie going from 57.16, her new PB, to 57.65 tonight, while the Canadian’s drop off was a little, going from 58.42 to 58.69.

Breaststroke Leg

Rank Swimmer Country Time
1 Kirill Prigoda Neutral Athletes 57.56 (1)
2 Qin Haiyang China 58.14 (2)
3 Nicolo Martinenghi Italy 58.63 (3)
4 Caspar Corbeau Netherlands 58.74 (4)
5 Oliver Dawson Canada 59.63 (7)
6 Taku Taniguchi Japan 59.48 (5)
7 Nash Wilkes Australia 59.98 (6)
8 Dominika Sztandera Poland 1:06.53 (8)

We can’t compare Kirill Prigoda’s time on this relay to his time in the individual event as he was disqualified in the final, but his performance this evening is certainly a strong improvement on the 59.36 that qualified him 8th into the final. With a strong lead of the Italians, Prigoda only added to it as he split a blistering 57.56 to give his team an over two-second lead on the Chinese, who, despite using the 2025 World Champion Qin Haiyang, started to fall further back, as Qin split 58.14. Qin did have the 50 breaststroke final before this race, but so did Prigoda, who outouched him in that race .05. Italy’s Nicolo Martinenghi did not have the 50, but the Olympic Champion and recent silver medalist in the event could not match his rivals’ speeds, and the Italians slipped from 2nd to 3rd.

Only one team opted to use a female breaststroker, with the Poles selecting Dominka Sztandera to fill the role. She finished 15th in the semifinals of the event with a time of 1:07.34, but split a commendable 1:06.53, just a little off her 1:06.20 from this morning.

Butterfly Leg

Rank Swimmer Country Time
1 Josh Liendo Canada 49.64 (4)
2 Matthew Temple Australia 50.26 (3)
3 Jakub Majerski Poland 50.72 (8)
4 Zhang Yufei China 55.96 (2)
5 Daria Klepikova Neutral Athletes 55.97 (1)
6 Tessa Giele Netherlands 56.29 (5)
7 Mizuki Hirai Japan 56.78 (7)
8 Costanza Cocconcelli Italy 57.90 (6)
The teams that used a female on one of the front two legs all opted for a male butterflier and it was Canada’s Josh Liendo who made the most of it as he split 49.64 to pull his team from 7th to 4th as he made up 6.33 seconds to trail the NAB team by 2.65 seconds. The Canadians also used Liendo on this leg in Paris, and despite not having the strong meet so far, Liendo’s split was faster, as he was 50.08 in the Olympic final. So too was Matthew Temple, who was 50.42 in Paris but 50.26 this evening. Like Liendo, Temple moved the Australians up three places from 6th into the bronze medal position, but like the Canadians, they were well off the lead of the NAB team.
While Liendo and Temple did their job, so too did Daria Klepikova. She finished 5th in the individual final in the event with a time of 56.53 and was right on that time (if you include a relay start) as she posted the 2nd fastest split by a female on this leg, splitting 55.97. The only female to outsplit here was China’s Zhang Yufei. China, who were in second, seemed to be best poised to close the gap on the NAB team, but Zhang was only .01 faster and the gap between the two remained just over two seconds.

Freestyle Leg

Rank Swimmer Country Time (Place)
1 Marrit Steenbergen Netherlands 51.91 (4)
2 Daria Trofimova Neutral Athletes 52.66 (1)
=2 Qingfeng Wu China 52.66 (2)
4 Sara Curtis Italy 52.88 (6)
5 Taylor Ruck Canada 52.94 (3)
6 Milla Jansen Australia 53.13 (5)
7 Nagisa Ikemoto Japan 53.88 (7)
8 Katarzyna Wasick Poland 53.83 (8)

Daria Trofimova entered the water with a lead of 2.02, and the writing was on the wall as that gap seemed to be too insurmountable to conquer, but Marrit Steenbergen of the Netherlands gave it her best shot as she opened in 24.42 and closed in 27.49 to record the only sub-52 split of 51.91. However, Trofimova, who entered the water ahead of the WR set by the USA last summer, was not that much slower as she opened in 24.83 and came home in 27.83, splitting 52.66, the 2nd fastest in the field, to take the win, a new national record and championship record for her team.

China’s Wu Qingfeng equalled Trofimova’s split of 52.66 and maintained her nation’s position, helping collect the silver medal for the team. The Australians had a bevy of options to use on the anchor leg and selected Milla Jansen. Jansen split 53.13, which was a little off her 52.89 from the women’s 4×100 free, while Taylor Ruck, who was 53.37 on Canada’s prelims 4×100 free relay, improved, and her 52.94 made all the difference as she ran down the Australian and secured the bronze medal for her team in a new national record of 3:40.97.

The Canadians were not the only team to rewrite their record books. The Russian/NAB team did as the Dutch did, passing the Australians for 4th place in the closing meters.

In This Story

13
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

13 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
WillisAlexander
10 months ago

Why didnt us Aussies put in someone stronger for the Anchor 100 free leg? Meg Harris perhaps? We could have won silver or bronze surely. And if not for Nash Wilkes atrocious breast leg, we definitely wouldve been a sure thing for silver minimum. At least kaylee put in a great performance, swimming a brilliant 57-mid while fighting against waves of men all around her.

Troyy
Reply to  WillisAlexander
10 months ago

Presumably Meg didn’t make herself available and Mollie had the 200 earlier in the session.

swim shady
10 months ago

USA better not blame this terrible world champs on the sickness. Don’t get me wrong, it affected some races and they’ve had some good races, but on the whole it wouldn’t have changed their terrible medal table by much. They better get their butts in gear for 2028 and lock in.

Lpman
Reply to  swim shady
10 months ago

What an insightful comment. You sound super intelligent.

GOATKeown
10 months ago

That was wild. In the end USA missing didn’t really matter because they weren’t ever beating that time

Tencor
Reply to  GOATKeown
10 months ago

Silver medals are still valuable

Troyy
10 months ago

Has Minakov competed yet? I haven’t noticed him at all. If he’s on form they look like strong favourites in the men’s medley.

Boknows
Reply to  Troyy
10 months ago

I think he was in the 100 free prelims and didn’t advance.

Cobalt
10 months ago

These guys would have won a bunch of races in Paris.

JACK LOPEZ
10 months ago

where is the United States?

Snarky
Reply to  JACK LOPEZ
10 months ago

Exactly.

Boknows
Reply to  JACK LOPEZ
10 months ago

Just north of Mexico

Lpman
10 months ago

China’s back and breast legs could have been a combined 1.5 seconds faster and could have given fly and free legs cleaner water.

I still don’t think there is any mathematical way the U.S. could have won even if they qualified. Our men’s back and breast legs are both too weak and you need to have at least one male swimmer in the front half.