ESPN’s Brett McMurphy reported late last week that the Big 12 Conference is entertaining presentations from a whopping 17 schools about expanding the league – which cracks open the door for the first big conference shakeup since Texas A&M and Missouri left that conference for the SEC in 2012.
An approximate breakdown of the decision will be made on 90% football considerations, 5% basketball considerations, and some smaller percentage dedicated to some nebulous academic considerations, maybe.
The Big 12 Conference doesn’t consider much outside of the revenue sports. Among the Power 5 Conferences, the Big 12 averages fewer NCAA-sponsored varsity sports (18.4 average, 18 median) than any other conference.
That relative dearth is highlighted as much in swimming as it is anywhere else. The conference has 10 primary member schools (despite its name). Those 10 primary member schools sponsor just 8 swim teams – 5 women’s (Texas, TCU, Kansas, Iowa State, West Virginia) and 3 men’s (Texas, TCU, West Virginia).
Editor’s Note: The Big 12 has 10 other schools who are affiliated in women’s rowing, wrestling, and women’s gymnastics, but have their own conferences for the majority of their sports, including swimming.
While the decisions will not be made based on swimming, swimming will be impacted. Texas is far-and-away the dominant power in the conference. Their “B” squad (which they’re allowed to enter at Big 12s) is the second best team in the conference. Further, any boost to football revenue gives some hope that the 5 schools without swim programs might add them; or that the 2 schools with women’s only programs might add a men’s program.
More than that, some of these schools, while historically mid-major programs, would offer a big boost to swimming in the conference. None of the 17 would immediately challenge the Longhorns’ dominance, but more than one have had success out of smaller conferences.
The SMU women have scored at NCAA’s 33 times. That’s all but two of the NCAA Championships there have been for women, including a high water mark of 2nd in 1996 – and 29 individual event titles. While they haven’t been as good the last few seasons, they have a top-20 finish in 2014.
The Boise State women have become regulars at the NCAA Championships as well – including scoring in 2011 and 2012. They don’t have a men’s team, however.
Connecticut, Cincinnati, and BYU are all trending in the right direction for national relevance in swimming.
The latest reports are that the Big 12 is looking to add two schools to become a two-division, 12-team league (although the NCAA dropped the requirement to have 12 members to hold a conference championship game). It’s possible, though rumored to be less-likely, that the Big 12 adds 4 teams to become a 14 team league – matching the SEC.
Geographically, Houston (which has a Big-12 worthy aquatics facility already) and SMU (which is building one) make the most sense, however the Big 12 already has a strong foothold in the Dallas and Houston television markets thanks to the University of Texas and Oklahoma University, so they may not provide the biggest benefit demographically.
Those schools also have the benefit of historical rivalries with current Big 12 members Baylor and SMU in their favor.
Below, see a chart of all 17 interested schools, along with relevant details about their swimming programs.
M/W Swimming Sponsorship** | Current Conference (for swimming, or football where swimming not applicable) | 2016 Conference Finish (M/W) | Number of Times Scoring at NCAAs (M/W) | Enrollment (approximate) | |
Cincinnati | Both | AAC | 3rd/4th | 22/18 | 44251 |
BYU | Both | MPSF | 1st/4th | 19/ | 27163 |
Connecticut | Both | AAC | 6th/4th | NA/ | 18395 |
East Carolina | Both | AAC | 5th/1st | NA/ | 22252 |
SMU | Both | AAC | 1st/2nd | 58/ | 11643 |
Houston | Women only | AAC | NA/4th | 7/27 | 42704 |
Colorado State | Women only | Mountain West | NA/8th | 7/7 | 32236 |
Boise State | Women only | Mountain West | NA/2nd | NA/2 | 22113 |
Tulane | Women only | AAC | NA/2nd | 2/NA | 13449 |
New Mexico | Women only | Mountain West | NA/7th | 20/3 | 27353 |
San Diego State | Women only | Mountain West | NA/3rd | 1/20 | 33527 |
South Florida | Neither | AAC*** | NA | 48793 | |
Central Florida | Neither | AAC*** | NA | 63106* | |
Memphis | Neither | AAC*** | NA | 20585 | |
Temple | Neither | AAC*** | NA | 38297 | |
Northern Illinois | Neither | MAC*** | NA | 20130 | |
Arkansas State | Neither | Sun Belt*** | NA | 13144 | |
*Central Florida has the biggest public university campus in the United States by enrollment. | |||||
**At the Varsity level | |||||
***But not swim team | |||||
Note: 5 of 6 schools with women only once supported men’s swimming as well. Boise State is the exception |
Ecu pirates!!!! Purple haze!
“Connecticut, Cincinnati, and BYU are all trending in the right direction for national relevance in swimming”.. Please explain. I cannot speak to BYU’s program, however BOTH of the other schools mentioned have been average to below average within their own AAC conference. Cinci has 1 national level talent in Keire(no arguement shes a stud) Men ? , Connecticut has no one M or W…where exactly is the trend??? How will either of those teams contribute to the BIG 12 swimming scene? When inserting the 2015 or 2016 results how do they fit? My guess is neither finish in top 3, which to me says volumes esp on the mens side.
Connecticut gets good recruits from in and out of state but fails to do anything with them 🙁
this will depend heavily on football. BYU and Boise seem to make the most sense
pvdh – while those are probably the BEST football programs, they’re also from among the smaller television markets of those teams. I think Cincinnati, the Florida schools, Memphis, or even Connecticut or Colorado State could make sense if they thought that would give them a foothold in those bigger television markets.
it will now be referred to as the Big 29
Just a (small) heads up – I think you may have the Men and Womens results from the AAC backwards. (ECU men won and SMU women, for example)