Subscribe to SwimSwam Magazine

Texas Looking to Top Podium for First Time Since 2021: Scoring the 2025 Men’s NCAA Psych Sheet

Comments: 23
by Madeline Folsom 23

March 12th, 2025 College, News

2025 Men’s NCAA Swimming and Diving Championships

  • March 26-29, 2025
  • Weyerhaeuser King County Aquatics Center, Federal Way, Washington
  • Short Course Yards (25 yards)
  • Psych Sheets

The 2025 Men’s NCAA Championships are upon us, and we officially have psych sheets. This means we get to take a closer look at how the meet would score if there was no diving and everyone swam their exact seed times, or at least their exact seed placement.

While anything can happen at the meet, this is the first official look we will get at what the meet might look like in terms of the top teams and what the potential races might be. This year, we could be looking at an exciting race on the men’s side, especially once diving factors in, but based on psych sheets alone, the Texas men are poised to reclaim their top place on the podium after a disappointing Championships last year.

Based on our projections, Texas comes in ahead of Florida outscoring them 480 to 420. Looking at individual points alone, Texas has the potential to score more points than the UVA women with 330 points to the Cavalier’s 334. Once we add relays and diving to these scores the teams could still be close because while the UVA women could win all five relays, the Texas men are far better at diving.

After Texas, Florida sits solidly in 2nd with their 420 points, more than 100 points ahead of 3rd place.

That’s where the team scores get exciting. Without diving, California (292) and Indiana (291.5) have less than half-a-point separating them. Indiana has the clear upper hand when you add diving points, but the team race is shaping up to be close.

Reigning champions Arizona State sit back in 6th place behind Tennessee, scoring a projected 245 points to the Tennessee’s 277.

Thank you to Andrew Mering for compiling this data.

Scored Psych Sheet​

Rank Team Score Individual Relay Scoring Individual Count Individual Swim Count
Relay Entry Count
1 Texas 480 330 150 28 49 5
2 Florida 420 238 182 21 44 5
3 California 292 160 132 14 50 5
4 Indiana 291.5 187.5 104 23 41 5
5 Tennessee 277 125 152 10 24 4
6 Arizona St 245 97 148 9 33 5
7 NC State 197.5 69.5 128 9 35 5
8 Georgia 165 125 40 10 15 4
9 Stanford 149 61 88 7 33 5
10 Michigan 133 67 66 6 19 5
11 Florida St 107 53 54 5 15 5
12 Virginia Tech 104.5 46.5 58 5 18 5
13 Ohio St 94 48 46 6 21 5
14 Louisville 71 43 28 4 17 5
15 Alabama 71 31 40 4 14 4
16 Texas A&M 62 48 14 6 15 5
17 Auburn 44 24 20 7 9 5
18 Yale 37 37 0 4 6 4
19 Arizona 36 10 26 2 9 4
20 Virginia 35 21 14 2 12 4
21 LSU 33 21 12 3 9 5
22 Brown 31 31 0 2 3 0
23 UNC 30 18 12 3 25 5
24 Southern Cali 30 18 12 2 16 5
25 Wisconsin 28 4 24 2 15 5
26 Kentucky 27 27 0 3 9 0
27 Penn 20 20 0 1 3 0
28 Cal Baptist 13.5 13.5 0 2 5 0
29 Army 13 13 0 1 5 2
30 Princeton 8 8 0 2 3 2
31 Cornell 7 7 0 1 3 0
32 Georgia Tech 5 5 0 1 6 4
33 SMU 3 3 0 1 3 4
34 Minnesota 2 2 0 1 12 2
34 Delaware 2 2 0 1 3 0
36 Harvard 1 1 0 1 3 3
Northwestern 0 0 0 0 10 3
Missouri 0 0 0 0 7 4
Pittsburgh 0 0 0 0 3 0
UNLV 0 0 0 0 3 0
Hawaii 0 0 0 0 3 0
SIUC 0 0 0 0 3 0
La Salle 0 0 0 0 3 0
Purdue 0 0 0 0 3 0
U.S. Navy 0 0 0 0 3 0
South Carolina 0 0 0 0 2 0
TCU 0 0 0 0 2 0
Columbia 0 0 0 0 2 0

Again, these scores don’t include diving, which is going to have a significant impact on scores. Texas has qualified the maximum number of 18 swimmers to the meet, and if they want to bring any divers they will need to scratch someone. This could impact their point scores to move them even further ahead of Cal, especially with some of their young talent on the boards.

Michigan has the smallest team in the top 10, bringing only seven swimmers to the meet. Six of them are projected to score 67 points, earning Michigan a spot in the top 10 teams.

Florida State is another team that is expected to score well with very few athletes, looking at 11th place with just five athletes who are all potential scorers. FSU has had an exceptional season, and they could more than triple their score from NCAAs last year, where they scored 34 points. This year they are looking at 107 points and a 10 position jump to from 21st to 11th.

Points by Event and Day

200 Medley Relay 800 Free Relay Day 1 500 Free 200 IM 50 Free 200 Free Relay Day 2 100 Fly 400 IM 200 Free 100 Breast 100 Back 400 Medley Relay Day 3 1650 Free 200 Back 100 Free 200 Breast 200 Fly 400 Free Relay Day 4
Texas 32 34 66 44 30 13 26 113 0.5 45 36 21 36 34 172.5 39 37.5 13 15 0 24 128.5
Florida 34 40 74 11.5 20 27 34 92.5 33.5 29 12 23 20 40 157.5 2 17 30 13 0 34 96
California 26 30 56 25 0 14 22 61 7 0 0 11 7 24 49 17 28 16 17 18 30 126
Indiana 28 6 34 3 31 0 14 48 5.5 0 4 51 21 30 111.5 11 27 0 34 0 26 98
Tennessee 40 0 40 0 0 37.5 40 77.5 2.5 0 17 0 12 32 63.5 0 0 35 0 21 40 96
Arizona St 30 26 56 0 0 26 32 58 16 0 6.5 0 5 28 55.5 7 0 19.5 0 17 32 75.5
NC State 22 22 44 0 7 12 30 49 0 4 0 0 6 26 36 23 9 8.5 0 0 28 68.5
Georgia 0 32 32 31 3 0 0 34 17 20 14 0 9 0 60 0 0 0 0 31 8 39
Stanford 12 24 36 0 1 0 8 9 15 0 11 6 0 22 54 12 1 0 0 15 22 50
Michigan 18 8 26 0 28 0 28 56 13.5 7 6.5 0 0 12 39 0 0 0 0 12 0 12
Florida St 24 2 26 0 0 0 4 4 11 0 0 0 25 14 50 0 11 0 0 6 10 27
Virginia Tech 10 0 10 0 11 0 12 23 6.5 0 0 12 0 18 36.5 0 0 0 17 0 18 35
Ohio St 4 10 14 0 9 5 18 32 0 17 13 0 0 0 30 0 2 2 0 0 14 18
Louisville 14 14 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 14 0 0 25 0 0 0 18 0 0 18
Alabama 0 28 28 12 0 0 0 12 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 1 0 0 0 0 12 13
Texas A&M 0 0 0 0 5 7 4 16 12 16 0 0 0 6 34 0 0 7 1 0 4 12
Auburn 6 4 10 4.5 6 0 10 20.5 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 4 3.5 0 0 3 0 10.5
Yale 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 17 6 0 1 0 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 0 0 13
Arizona 0 18 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 8 17 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Virginia 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 9 0 0 0 0 4 13 0 12 0 0 0 6 18
LSU 8 0 8 1 0 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 11 0 0 2 13
Brown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 16 0 0 16
UNC 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 10 15 0 0 0 4 9 0 13
Southern Cali 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 16 0 16
Wisconsin 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 27 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kentucky 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 21
Penn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 20
Cal Baptist 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 12
Army 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Princeton 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Cornell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7
Georgia Tech 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5
SMU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Minnesota 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Delaware 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harvard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Northwestern 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Missouri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pittsburgh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNLV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hawaii 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SIUC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
La Salle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Purdue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U.S. Navy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
South Carolina 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TCU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Columbia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Florida has a strong first day, and they are expected to be in front after the relays, thanks to their top seed in the 800 free relay, and their 2nd seed in the 200 medley. After that first day, however, Florida does not have a single day with more projected points than the Longhorns.

Days 2, 3, and 4 are all Texas’ to lose with almost 20 point separating them from Florida every day.

Cal has a very strong day four, with 126 predicted points, but they have a lot of ground to make up with only 49 points on day 3, thanks to their zero points in the men’s 200 freestyle.

Tennessee has strong relays, but there are numerous events where they are looking at no points, including the 800 freestyle relay where zero points would significantly hurt any chances they have of catching up with the teams ahead of them.

Projected Score by Athlete

Note: These are only athletes who are seeded to score in at least one of their individual events.

Last First Year School Points Event 1 Seed Time Event 2 Seed Time Event 3 Seed Time
Crooks, Jordan SR Tennessee 57 50 Free 1 17.85 200 Free 2 1:30.00 100 Free 1 40.26
Maurer, Rex SO Texas 56 500 Free 1 4:04.45 400 IM 1 3:34.19 1650 Free 3 14:30.47
Liendo, Joshua JR Florida 54 50 Free 2 18.26 100 Fly 1 43.23 100 Free 2 40.45
Kos, Hubert JR Texas 51 200 IM 4 1:40.51 100 Back 3 44.03 200 Back 1 1:35.72
Smith, Julian SR Florida 49 200 IM 1 1:39.38 100 Breast 1 49.51 100 Free 9 41.34
Kharun, Ilya SO Arizona St 48 50 Free 4 18.51 100 Fly 3 43.85 200 Fly 2 1:38.07
McDonald, Owen JR Indiana 48 200 IM 2 1:39.89 100 Back 4 44.38 200 Back 3 1:37.15
Johnston, David SR Texas 45 500 Free 6 4:09.41 400 IM 7 3:39.07 1650 Free 1 14:26.00
Modglin, William SO Texas 44 200 IM 6 1:40.64 100 Back 2 43.91 200 Back 5 1:37.84
Guiliano, Christopher SR Texas 42 50 Free 6 18.61 200 Free 3 1:30.31 100 Free 6 41.13
Magahey, Jacob Grad Georgia 41 500 Free 4 4:08.61 400 IM 4 3:37.89 200 Fly 8 1:39.91
Coll Marti, Carles Grad Virginia Tech 40 200 IM 8 1:40.95 100 Breast 7 50.78 200 Breast 2 1:49.62
Urlando, Gianluca JR Georgia 40 200 IM 14 1:41.46 100 Fly 2 43.62 200 Fly 1 1:37.17
Marshall, Jonathon SO Florida 37 200 Free 47 1:34.10 100 Back 1 43.73 200 Back 2 1:35.85
Arkhangelskiy, Michel FR Florida St 36 100 Fly 8 44.36 100 Back 5 44.49 200 Back 8 1:38.50
Caribe, Guilherme JR Tennessee 31 50 Free 3 18.42 100 Fly 18 44.76 100 Free 4 40.85
Henveaux, Lucas Grad California 31 500 Free 5 4:08.83 400 IM 29 3:42.05 1650 Free 2 14:29.74
Kelly, John SR Brown 31 200 IM 51 1:44.14 100 Breast 4 50.60 200 Breast 3 1:49.80
MILLARD, NOAH JR Yale 31 500 Free 2 4:07.68 200 Free 16 1:31.86 1650 Free 6 14:33.47
Alexy, John SR California 30 50 Free 5 18.58 200 Free 37 1:32.98 100 Free 3 40.82
Koski, Tomas SO Georgia 30 500 Free 3 4:08.25 200 Free 5 1:30.70 1650 Free 22 14:47.73
Minakov, Andrei SR Stanford 30 100 Fly 4 44.27 200 Fly 4 1:39.03
Hawke, Charlie SR Alabama 27 500 Free 7 4:09.75 200 Free 4 1:30.44 100 Free 37 42.16
Foote, Connor JR Texas A&M 26 50 Free 10 18.67 100 Fly 7 44.34 100 Free 10 41.38
Jankovics, Tristan JR Ohio St 26 200 IM 9 1:41.09 400 IM 2 3:35.51 200 Breast 36 1:53.93
Jett, Gabriel SR California 26 500 Free 8 4:10.27 200 Free 24 1:32.13 200 Back 4 1:37.19
Germonprez, Nathaniel SO Texas 25 200 IM 22 1:42.24 100 Breast 3 50.14 200 Breast 9 1:50.55
Kulow, Jonathan JR Arizona St 25 50 Free 8 18.64 200 Free 31 1:32.41 100 Free 5 40.97
Petrashov, Denis Grad Louisville 25 100 Breast 5 50.62 200 Breast 8 1:50.35
Geer, Colin SO Michigan 24 200 IM 7 1:40.65 100 Fly 27 45.10 200 Fly 7 1:39.58
Matheny, Joshua SR Indiana 24 100 Breast 9 50.94 200 Breast 4 1:49.83
Okadome, Yamato FR California 23 100 Breast 8 50.87 200 Breast 7 1:50.19
GROUMI, Gal SR Michigan 22.5 200 IM 3 1:40.34 200 Free 10 1:31.57 200 Fly 41 1:43.91
Brooks, Finlay SR Indiana 22 50 Free 32 19.12 100 Fly 12 44.59 100 Breast 2 49.94
Hobson, Luke SR Texas 22 500 Free 15 4:11.68 200 Free 1 1:29.34 100 Free 38 42.19
McCarty, Quintin SO NC State 21 50 Free 7 18.63 100 Back 11 44.99 100 Free 14 41.45
Nelson, Baylor JR Texas A&M 21 200 IM 12 1:41.43 400 IM 3 3:37.47 200 Breast 32 1:53.24
Linscheer, Giovanni JR Florida 20.5 500 Free 12 4:11.03 400 IM 5 3:38.46 1650 Free 15 14:45.25
Fallon, Matthew SR Penn 20 500 Free 55 4:19.07 100 Breast 21 51.46 200 Breast 1 1:48.85
Hribar, Jere SO LSU 20 50 Free 9 18.65 200 Free 35 1:32.91 100 Free 8 41.25
Painter, Alexander FR Florida 20 50 Free 13 18.80 200 Free 7 1:31.13 100 Free 13 41.41
Rose, Oludare Grad California 20 100 Fly 10 44.52 200 Fly 6 1:39.47
Buff, Scott SO Florida 19.5 50 Free 11 18.73 100 Fly 5 44.28 100 Back 24 45.23
Barr, Luke SR Indiana 18 200 IM 5 1:40.62 100 Breast 16 51.17 100 Back 13 45.02
Chmielewski, Krzysztof SO Southern Cali 18 500 Free 41 4:16.25 400 IM 15 3:40.57 200 Fly 3 1:38.99
Yep, Jassen Grad Indiana 18 200 IM 32 1:42.98 100 Breast 13 51.10 200 Breast 5 1:49.93
Savickas, Aleksas JR Florida 16 200 IM 52 1:44.42 100 Breast 14 51.15 200 Breast 6 1:50.02
Navikonis, Tomas JR Ohio St 15 50 Free 42 19.32 200 Free 6 1:31.01 100 Free 15 41.55
Sandidge, Levi JR Kentucky 15 500 Free 36 4:15.39 400 IM 32 3:42.52 1650 Free 4 14:30.61
Lierz, Harrison Grad Tennessee 14.5 100 Fly 14 44.67 100 Back 7 44.76 200 Back 31 1:40.48
Espernberger, Martin JR Tennessee 14 100 Fly 36 45.43 200 Fly 5 1:39.34
Lloyd, Kenneth Grad NC State 14 500 Free 29 4:14.13 400 IM 35 3:43.94 1650 Free 5 14:31.64
Sarkany, Zalan JR Indiana 14 500 Free 14 4:11.62 400 IM 33 3:43.36 1650 Free 8 14:37.49
Fabiani, Remi JR Cal Baptist 13.5 50 Free 15 18.82 100 Back 30 45.40 100 Free 7 41.23
Ray, Tyler JR Michigan 13.5 50 Free 17 18.83 100 Fly 5 44.28 200 Fly 17 1:40.55
Benzing, Brian Grad Indiana 13 200 IM 33 1:43.01 100 Breast 6 50.73 200 Breast 37 1:53.97
Crush, John FR Army 13 50 Free 62 19.60 100 Back 6 44.53 100 Free 45 42.33
Lasco, Destin Grad California 13 200 IM 17 1:41.68 100 Back 24 45.23 200 Back 6 1:38.21
Lucas, Cooper FR Texas 13 500 Free 28 4:13.77 400 IM 6 3:39.02 200 Fly 23 1:41.08
Custer, Liam JR Stanford 12 500 Free 44 4:16.68 400 IM 42 3:47.97 1650 Free 7 14:36.44
Hick, Carson SO Kentucky 12 500 Free 11 4:10.89 200 Free 43 1:33.61 1650 Free 11 14:43.70
King, David FR Virginia 12 500 Free 25 4:13.43 100 Back 20 45.11 200 Back 7 1:38.36
Sammon, Patrick SR Arizona St 12 50 Free 37 19.21 200 Free 10 1:31.57 100 Free 11 41.39
Bried, Thomas JR Louisville 11 400 IM 8 3:39.28 200 Breast 33 1:53.65 200 Fly 32 1:41.93
McFadden, Henry SO Stanford 11 500 Free 17 4:12.33 200 Free 8 1:31.30 100 Free 63 42.72
Schmidt, Danny JR Auburn 11 200 IM 11 1:41.42 200 Free 15 1:31.80 200 Fly 14 1:40.43
Scholtz, Will SO Texas 11 100 Breast 12 51.03 200 Breast 11 1:51.04
Wilson, Maximillian JR Florida St 11 50 Free 44 19.35 100 Back 8 44.82 100 Free 52 42.43
Corbeau, Caspar Grad Indiana 10 50 Free 44 19.35 100 Breast 10 50.97 200 Breast 14 1:51.65
Carrozza, Coby Grad Texas 9 500 Free 9 4:10.70 200 Free 29 1:32.27 200 Fly 34 1:41.99
Daleiden Ciuferri, Ralph JR Arizona 9 50 Free 62 19.60 200 Free 9 1:31.48 100 Free 39 42.20
Laur, Mason SR Florida 9 200 IM 38 1:43.37 400 IM 9 3:39.32 200 Fly 38 1:42.71
Lunak, Sebastian SO UNC 9 200 IM 45 1:43.55 100 Fly 37 45.56 200 Fly 9 1:40.12
Nicholas, Spencer FR Virginia 9 200 IM 29 1:42.67 100 Fly 9 44.41 100 Free 65 42.77
Norris, Lance JR NC State 9 500 Free 30 4:14.22 400 IM 41 3:47.34 1650 Free 9 14:38.69
Van Renen, Ruard JR Georgia 9 100 Fly 46 46.11 100 Back 9 44.95 200 Back 22 1:39.92
Zheltiakov, Oleksandr FR NC State 9 100 Back 38 45.78 200 Back 9 1:38.78
Mathias, Mason SR Auburn 8.5 500 Free 12 4:11.03 200 Free 51 1:34.64 1650 Free 13 14:45.11
Knedla, Miroslav FR Indiana 8 200 IM 24 1:42.35 100 Back 13 45.02 200 Back 12 1:39.26
Schott, Mitchell JR Princeton 8 200 IM 13 1:41.44 400 IM 17 3:40.69 200 Fly 13 1:40.42
Diehl, Daniel SO NC State 7 200 IM 10 1:41.39 200 Free 34 1:32.75 200 Back 17 1:39.62
Eccleston, Jacob FR Louisville 7 100 Breast 23 51.49 200 Breast 10 1:51.03
Kammann, Bjoern SR Tennessee 7 100 Fly 29 45.12 200 Fly 10 1:40.18
Matheson, Daniel SR Arizona St 7 500 Free 31 4:14.37 400 IM 26 3:41.45 1650 Free 10 14:43.46
Mitchell, Jacob SR Florida 7 500 Free 10 4:10.72 200 Free 19 1:31.88 1650 Free 20 14:47.44
Peck, Kyle FR Texas 7 100 Fly 16 44.74 100 Back 13 45.02 200 Back 13 1:39.36
Petty, Evan SR California 7 50 Free 50 19.39 100 Back 10 44.97 100 Free 62 42.69
Polonsky, Ron SR Stanford 7 200 IM 16 1:41.66 100 Breast 11 50.99 200 Breast 23 1:52.36
Ubertalli, Pietro JR Cornell 7 200 IM 47 1:43.88 100 Back 29 45.29 200 Back 10 1:38.99
Wigginton, Lorne FR Michigan 7 500 Free 34 4:15.25 400 IM 10 3:39.76 200 Fly 39 1:42.98
Brown, Eric JR Florida 6 500 Free 27 4:13.66 400 IM 11 3:39.89 1650 Free 34 14:56.84
FINCH, Nicholas FR Yale 6 50 Free 31 19.07 100 Fly 11 44.57 100 Free 61 42.63
Robinson, Logan FR Florida St 6 200 IM 55 1:44.51 100 Fly 42 45.94 200 Fly 11 1:40.34
Van Westering, Kai JR Indiana 6 100 Back 35 45.64 200 Back 11 1:39.24
Winkler, Kaii FR NC State 5.5 50 Free 49 19.37 200 Free 27 1:32.23 100 Free 11 41.39
Applebaum, Frank Grad California 5 100 Fly 47 46.25 200 Fly 12 1:40.39
Hitchcock, Stephen FR Georgia 5 200 IM 35 1:43.20 400 IM 12 3:39.98 200 Fly 24 1:41.09
Hussey, Patrick Grad UNC 5 500 Free 35 4:15.35 200 Free 12 1:31.68 200 Fly 33 1:41.94
Kilavuz, Mert SR Georgia Tech 5 500 Free 52 4:18.75 1650 Free 12 14:44.90
Klinge, Matthew FR Ohio St 5 50 Free 12 18.78 100 Fly 34 45.39 100 Free 59 42.56
Rivers, Charles JR California 5 100 Breast 31 51.63 200 Breast 12 1:51.23
Wadsworth, Jack SR Arizona St 5 500 Free 50 4:17.58 100 Back 12 45.01 200 Back 36 1:42.22
Stoffle, Nathaniel SR Auburn 4.5 100 Fly 41 45.85 100 Back 16 45.04 200 Back 13 1:39.36
Delmar, Benjamin SO UNC 4 200 IM 49 1:43.95 100 Breast 20 51.44 200 Breast 13 1:51.29
Miroslaw, Rafael SR Indiana 4 500 Free 54 4:18.94 200 Free 13 1:31.73 100 Free 30 41.97
Molla Yanes, Mario SR Virginia Tech 4 100 Fly 13 44.63 100 Back 33 45.59 200 Back 33 1:40.78
Ponsler, Kyle JR NC State 4 500 Free 32 4:14.42 400 IM 13 3:40.05 200 Back 38 1:43.62
Alves, Kaique SR Alabama 3 200 Free 14 1:31.78 100 Breast 19 51.37 100 Free 27 41.92
Hoagland, Jack Grad SMU 3 500 Free 39 4:15.74 400 IM 14 3:40.40 1650 Free 35 15:00.45
Huckabay, Jackson SR Texas 3 500 Free 22 4:13.06 1650 Free 14 14:45.18
Torepe-Ormsby, Taiko JR Wisconsin 3 50 Free 14 18.81 100 Fly 50 46.44 100 Free 26 41.91
Ramadan, Youssef Grad Virginia Tech 2.5 100 Fly 14 44.67 100 Back 18 45.07 100 Free 25 41.89
Barnett, Toby SO Indiana 2 200 IM 34 1:43.13 400 IM 24 3:41.27 200 Breast 15 1:51.73
Jahn, Cornelius FR Ohio St 2 200 Free 52 1:34.70 100 Back 34 45.62 200 Back 15 1:39.50
Johnson, Jacob FR Minnesota 2 50 Free 64 19.62 100 Fly 32 45.21 200 Fly 15 1:40.47
Namakonov, Matvei JR Delaware 2 50 Free 53 19.43 100 Breast 15 51.16 100 Free 57 42.53
Taylor, Camden SO Texas 2 200 IM 15 1:41.58 200 Free 19 1:31.88 100 Free 47 42.35
Taylor, Lamar Grad Tennessee 1.5 50 Free 15 18.82 100 Back 41 45.93 100 Free 30 41.97
Alcantara, Leonardo SO Alabama 1 500 Free 33 4:15.19 1650 Free 16 14:45.45
Lekic, Jovan SO LSU 1 500 Free 16 4:12.26 200 Free 33 1:32.65
LUKMINAS, Tomas FR Arizona 1 50 Free 47 19.36 200 Free 26 1:32.22 100 Free 16 41.56
Mark Torok, Dominik JR Wisconsin 1 200 IM 48 1:43.89 400 IM 16 3:40.59 200 Fly 37 1:42.53
Sanchez, Alexander Grad Texas A&M 1 200 IM 59 1:45.01 100 Breast 33 51.87 200 Breast 16 1:51.87
Schmitt, David SO Harvard 1 100 Fly 40 45.75 100 Back 45 46.54 200 Fly 16 1:40.52
Sequeira, Aaron SR Stanford 1 200 IM 44 1:43.51 100 Back 17 45.06 200 Back 16 1:39.54
Frankel, Tomer Grad Indiana 0.5 100 Fly 16 44.74 200 Fly 21 1:40.94

No men’s swimmers are seeded to win all three of their individual events. Jordan Crooks is projected to be the top individual point scorer at 57 points, with two 1st seeds in the 50 free and 100 free and a 2nd seed in the 200 freestyle to Luke Hobson.

After Crooks is Rex Maurer who is seeded to score 56, thanks to his two first place spots, the 500 free and 400 IM, and his 3rd place seed in the 1650 behind teammate David Johnston and Cal’s Lucas Henveaux.

Julian Smith is the only other men’s swimmer projected to win two of his individual events. He is seeded first in the 200 IM and in the 100 breast, where he holds the NCAA record. He sits back in 5th overall, though, due to his 9th seed in the 100 freestyle.

In This Story

23
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

23 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
lilly king’s engagement ring
17 seconds ago

If indianas 3 divers finish 1-2-3 in all 3 diving events, that’s 159 points for Indiana. I’m assuming that won’t happen but even this best case still wouldn’t put Indiana in the lead per psych sheet scoring

0
0
Reply
aquajosh
1 hour ago

Florida got three male divers qualified at Zones; two of the guys qualified in both springboards, and the platform specialist, who won by 30+ points, is qualified on all three apparatus.

0
0
Reply
96Swim
2 hours ago

This looks like one of the more exciting team races that I can remember. There’s a solid argument to be made for any of the top 5 especially when you factor in diving, who rested at conference and the variability of things like relay DQs. So excited to watch.

6
0
Reply
Marty T
3 hours ago

GOD I wish my NAME were podium right now. Grrrrrrrrr

11
-2
Reply
Podium McGoo
Reply to  Marty T
3 hours ago

Lucky me!

2
0
Reply
Marty T
Reply to  Podium McGoo
42 minutes ago

Are they looking to McGoo you too???? f me I missed out!!!

0
0
Reply
Bobthebuilderrocks
3 hours ago

Well, well, well. This will be a fun one

5
-1
Reply
Grant Drukker
3 hours ago

Feel like really only Hobson in the 500 is poised to move up and score more than projected.

Maurer, Johnston, Kos, Guilano all seem to be seeded about what they will score.

Will be interesting to see how Modglin and Germonprez do in there sophmore years. And how will the freshman hold up. As it is historically really hard to score and score a lot as freshman.

11
0
Reply
snailSpace
Reply to  Grant Drukker
3 hours ago

You don’t think he’s gonna move up from 38th in the 100?

7
0
Reply
Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  snailSpace
3 hours ago

No, Texas rested and went all-in on SEC’s.

5
-8
Reply
snailSpace
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
2 hours ago

Certainly. That 45.1 split from Worlds must have been a fluke.

Last edited 2 hours ago by snailSpace
0
0
Reply
Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  snailSpace
1 hour ago

Pretty sure that 45.1 was a typo in the results

1
-1
Reply
Horninco
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
23 minutes ago

Not sure if serious …😂

0
0
Reply
Horninco
Reply to  Bobthebuilderrocks
1 hour ago

Texas is emotionally exhausted from the intensity of the SEC meet.

6th place at NCAA

1
-1
Reply
Jimbo
Reply to  Horninco
56 minutes ago

Ooh. Lowering expectations!
Bad morale from roster cuts, 5th place. Or bizzarre 6th street plague is always an option.

1
-1
Reply
Horninco
Reply to  Jimbo
28 minutes ago

Sarcasm

0
0
Reply
Grant Drukker
Reply to  snailSpace
2 hours ago

With how fast the 100 free has gotten, I’m just not sure he has the speed to score in the A final.

1
0
Reply
snailSpace
Reply to  Grant Drukker
2 hours ago

He threw down a truly impressive split at SC Worlds. He is certainly not going to finish any lower than the B final.

0
0
Reply
Horninco
Reply to  Grant Drukker
1 hour ago

Will be tough for anyone to make the A final that’s not a favorite to win it. Crooks, Liendo, Alexy will almost certainly make the A but past those three you’ve got 15 guys fighting for 5 spots

Gonna be intense

2
0
Reply
Grant Drukker
Reply to  Horninco
20 minutes ago

That’s how I feel about a lot of events. You used to have sure fire A final guys, but now everyone is so fast there are only 2-3 in each event you can guarantee to be in the A final.

0
0
Reply
balla
3 hours ago

This would be much more realistic with diving points and Indiana and Cal didn’t seem to rest their top guys much or even at all for conference.

9
0
Reply
Shogun
Reply to  balla
3 hours ago

Agreed. Can we guesstimate or project diving pts based on current rank/scores/last years performances at ncaa’s?

1
0
Reply
Noah Duperre
Reply to  Shogun
2 hours ago

Stay tuned, I am working on a projection for diving points based on zone meet performances. That should be coming in the next week for women’s and shortly after that for the men’s meet

6
0
Reply

Don't want to miss anything?

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest updates!

Want to take your swimfandom to the next level?

Subscribe to SwimSwam Magazine!