Urbana University, Home to Coed Division II Swim Team, to Close Permanently

Ohio’s Urbana University will not re-open campus after the COVID-19 pandemic resolves, the school announced Tuesday. The private university closed all residence halls, moved to online learning, and canceled all remaining athletic events for the semester on March 12.

Urbana is a branch campus of Franklin University, which primarily serves an online student population and is headquartered in Columbus. The school, which has an enrollment of 1,254 for the 2019-20 school year, was founded in 1850 and acquired by Franklin in 2014.

“As a result of this decision, academic programming will be moved to Franklin University, while athletic offerings and on-site administrative roles will cease at the Urbana branch campus,” the school said in a news release.

Urbana’s Division II athletics program included a men’s and women’s swim team. Led by head coach Cassandra Wendall, the 2019-20 squad featured eight women and six men; Wendall was in her first full season with the team. The Knights finished ninth at the 2020 Great Midwest & Mountain East Conference Championships.

The school also hosts men’s teams in basketball, baseball, cross country, football, golf, soccer, volleyball and wrestling, as well as women’s teams in acrobatics & tumbling, basketball, cross country, golf, soccer, lacrosse, softball, volleyball and water polo.

The news came shortly before the College Swimming Coaches Association of America tweeted that “COVID-19 has claimed its first two swim teams.” It’s not clear at this point which teams the tweet was referencing โ€“ but presumably, Urbana is one of them.

29
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

29 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ladyvoldisser
3 years ago

Sad that so many as so sad

meeeee
3 years ago

This site may have to change its name to Swam Swam

sven
Reply to  meeeee
3 years ago

I’ve thought of the long-term future of this site a few times, and come to the conclusion that it will go one of two ways:

1) Mad Max is true and this site will seem like an absurd fantasy beyond comprehension

2) Waterworld is true and this site will basically turn into C-SPAN

Frankie 5 Angels
Reply to  sven
3 years ago

Remember when collegeswimming.com had a message board and that was our outlet for communications

Frankie 5 Angels
3 years ago

Buckle up, sadly just the beginning.

Swimfan
3 years ago

Not a huge loss to the swim community tbh

SwimSupport28
Reply to  Swimfan
3 years ago

That is ignorant. If you swim and love swimming, you support the sport no matter what. I hate the mindset that only if we lose the faster programs is it a loss. There were swimmers here who loved to swim and chose the school for a reason and that opportunity is gone. While it may not seem it to some , there are all different levels of swimmers that love swimming.

I_Said_It
Reply to  Swimfan
3 years ago

what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

SwimOH
Reply to  Swimfan
3 years ago

This is pretty insensitive. Even though they were not the fastest program in the country or even in the state, it gave kids who were not the fastest on their team a way to continue swimming in college. Many colleges and universities value the experience over any results because retention of students (matriculation) and their value as alumni does more than many know in maintaining the health and well-being of the institution. So now a kid who is not the fastest on their team with no hopes of making a JO cut has one less option for continuing to swim after high school.

GA Boy
Reply to  SwimOH
3 years ago

Is this a joke? To swim in college is to see good results. I am sorry for this program being cut but if it was really a โ€œjust for the experienceโ€ team, which I doubt it was, then it should be cut because that is a waist of money.
The truth is, there are plenty of college teams that are only for the experience, they should be shut down, if you are only wanting to swim, swim inter murals/ club! Otherwise itโ€™s a waste of tax money!

webepaint
Reply to  GA Boy
3 years ago

I’m sorry to hear about your waist. Maybe more intramural activity will help?

Chris
Reply to  GA Boy
3 years ago

This article is not about the program being cut due to performance related issues. The entire school closed. I disagree with your stance also. Smaller colleges tend to use their athletic department as an extension of admissions. These schools look to drive enrollment through squad sizes and marketing opportunities. The metric used to measure success for a lot of small college coaches is your recruiting number, not necessarily results and your budgets are funded through tuition revenue.

Swimming in college is more about being part of a community where you continue to grow and develop as a young adult, it is school of course. To perform professionally, is driven by results

Confused
Reply to  GA Boy
3 years ago

I have so many questions about your post. What are “good results” exactly? How does a swimming program, at a private university, waste tax money? What is “inter murals” swimming? If you doubt that it was a “just for the experience team,” then why would you want to cut it? Most importantly, what is a “waist of money?”

Pennsylvania Tuxedo
Reply to  Swimfan
3 years ago

SWIMFAN, thatโ€™s a clown comment bro.

Formerswimmer
Reply to  Swimfan
3 years ago

This might not seem like a โ€œhuge lossโ€ to you, but to the coaches and swimmers in this program, itโ€™s a huge loss. You have no idea what the students and athletes are going through at Urbana. We were not the biggest program, but we worked hard day in and day out in the pool, weight room, and the classroom. I would appreciate some respect because today, our swimmers and coaches need to find new homes.

sosa
Reply to  Swimfan
3 years ago

infinity downvotes

Swammer
Reply to  Swimfan
3 years ago

@swimfan
Your comment was unnecessary in this time of need. This program was growing bigger every year and faster. Rome was not built in a day and neither are athletic programs. Your comment now targets not just the athletes at this school but also the coaching staff that worked day and night to rebuild a stronger program. How about the next time you feel the need to make a comment you think about everyone involved in your comment and not just yourself.

Big Swarty
Reply to  Swimfan
3 years ago

Big facts

Ash
3 years ago

Coach Cassandra Wendall was in her second year with the team. As a graduating member of this program, my heart aches. The changes and improvements this school and athletic programs were making gave us so much hope. My heart breaks for my fellow Blue Knights ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™

PBJSwimming
Reply to  Ash
3 years ago

I’m very sorry that you’re losing your team. All the best to you and your fellow Blue Knights!

olde coach
3 years ago

Unfortunately a preview of coming attractions. Not just for swimming, but for some of these small private schools who were on the verge of “hitting the wall” due to the declining college age population prior to the pandemic

Justin Thompson
Reply to  olde coach
3 years ago

Unfortunately adding 6-7 million unemployed each week while we wait out this virus will have a trickle down effect for all of us.

Scoobysnak
3 years ago

It will be interesting to see the affects of this as they pertain to “for profit” schools vs. “non-profit” schools. I know those terms are loose at best but there are enough distinctions that one may come out of this on very different ground than another.

Justin Thompson
Reply to  Scoobysnak
3 years ago

Maybe instead of a college like Harvard, who has a 40 billion dollar endowment, siphoning off 8.7 million in Federal aid smaller schools like this should get the money.

PowerPlay
Reply to  Justin Thompson
3 years ago

Harvard is giving it back.

Admin
Reply to  PowerPlay
3 years ago

As I understand, Harvard never actually asked for or accepted the money. The politicians gave it to them, and then criticized them for it. So Harvard isn’t “giving it back,” they’re “rejecting it.”

Stanford and Princeton have done the same.

Cornell says it will take the money, as does Notre Dame (giving it all to students).

Irish Ringer
Reply to  Braden Keith
3 years ago

It’s no surprise that the politicians made a mistake given they often don’t read through these bills prior to passage. Good for Harvard and others rejecting it.

RoR
Reply to  Justin Thompson
3 years ago

A large part of the money for colleges and universities was earmarked for students and their expenses. Harvard and other high level schools have scores of impoverished, and frequently, first generation students on full stipends. Many of those students had no money to get home, pay for food without university food services, store their belongings, etc. If you look at the list of funding for colleges and universities in the bill, you can see the amount for students/university.

Swammer
3 years ago

What are the two teams that are gone now?

About Torrey Hart

Torrey Hart

Torrey is from Oakland, CA, and majored in media studies and American studies at Claremont McKenna College, where she swam distance freestyle for the Claremont-Mudd-Scripps team. Outside of SwimSwam,ย she has bylines at Sports Illustrated, Yahoo Sports, SB Nation, and The Student Life newspaper.

Read More »