Relay Roundup: Men’s 4×200 Freestyle Relay Split Breakdown

2016 RIO OLYMPIC GAMES

Team USA ran away with their fourth straight 4×200 freestyle relay gold medal tonight.  Here’s a breakdown of how it happened:

GOLD: United States – 7:00.66

Conor Dwyer – 1:45.23
Townley Hass – 1:44.14
Ryan Lochte – 1:46.03
Michael Phelps – 1:45.26

 

An easy win (predictably) for Team USA–it helps when you have three of the five fastest splits in the event.  The front half of the relay was as good as you could ask for; Conor Dwyer was right on his personal best, and Townley Haas turned in the fastest split in the entire field (an incredible 1:44.14).  By the time Haas was done, the lead was stretched to two full seconds, with two of the world’s greatest swimmers about to hit the water.

There were some major grumblings around the absence of Jack Conger in the final; Michael Phelps was added to the final relay, despite not swimming the 200 freestyle at Olympic Trials.  In addition, Conger actually out-split Ryan Lochte in prelims, but Lochte played it very safe on the start and didn’t have any competition as the preliminary anchor leg.  After his 47.12 split in the 4×100 freestyle relay, there’s no question Michael Phelps belonged on this relay, and he backed it up.  Even after the 200 fly final, Phelps split a half-second faster than Conger or Ryan Lochte did in prelims.  However, even without the hindsight of tonight’s splits, there’s arguments that Conger should have gotten the nod over Lochte, who was just a 1:46.03.

SILVER: Great Britain – 7:03.13

Stephen Milne – 1:46.97
Duncan Scott – 1:45.05
Dan Wallace – 1:46.26
James Guy – 1:44.85

 

A silver was as good as it was going to get for the British; with Team USA bringing their ‘A’ squad, retaining the championship belt from Kazan was unlikely.  Britain has really rebounded from a poor showing at their Olympic Trials.  Stephen Milne was near his best leading off (1:46.97), Dan Wallace held strong in the third spot relative to his flat start best of 1:47.04, and James Guy did what was necessary to secure a silver medal.

The true difference maker, though, was Duncan Scott, who continued his career meet with a 1:45.05 split, which is more than two seconds faster than his best ever flat start of 1:47.28.  Scott nabbed a spot in the 100 freestyle final tomorrow, and has to have incredible momentum and confidence after his relay swim tonight.

BRONZE: Japan – 7:03.50

Kosuke Hagino – 1:45.34
Naito Ehara – 1:46.11
Yuki Kobori – 1:45.71
Takeshi Matsuda – 1:46.34

A pleasant surprise for the Japanese, who haven’t medaled in this event since they hosted the games in 1964, and hasn’t been a factor at Worlds in recent memory.  Kosuke Hagino was–unsurprisingly–consistently excellent leading off, but Yuki Kobori was the story, with a 1:45.71 third leg that was nearly 1.5 seconds under his best flat start time.  Naito Ehara and Takeshi Matsuda both did their jobs, outsplitting their personal bests.

4TH: Australia – 7:04.18

Thomas Fraser-Holmes – 1:45.81
David McKeon – 1:45.63
Daniel Smith – 1:47.37
Mack Horton – 1:45.37

Another stomach-punch moment for Australia.  A week ago, there was no way the Aussies don’t win a medal, but an interesting personnel choice and a quick Japanese squad kept them off the podium.  The Australian coaching staff elected to leave both Cameron McEvoy and Kyle Chalmers off in favor of Daniel Smith, who split just 1:47.37 in the third spot, taking the Aussies out of the race.

It wasn’t all bad for Australia, though; David McKeon rebounded from a disastrous 1:48.38 individual swim with a great 1:45.63 split (his personal best flat start is 1:46.33), and Mack Horton continued his excellent meet with a 1:45.37 anchor leg.

5TH: Russia – 7:05.70

Danila Izotov – 1:46.72
Aleksandr Krasnykh – 1:45.67
Nikita Lobintsev – 1:46.31
Mikhaul Dovgalyuk – 1:47.00

Russia was a fringe candidate for a medal, but they were in the mix until their anchor leg.  Danila Izotov was just so-so leading off, but Aleksandr Krasnykh had a very good second leg to keep the Russians in striking distance.  Nikita Lobintsev was fine on the third leg; not great, but not bad.  Anchor leg Mikhaul Dovgalyuk just didn’t have enough.  Interestingly, Russia left off Alexander Sukhorukov, who, although he has a slower flat start time, has a ton of past experience on the 800 freestyle relay, and is coming off repeated 47-second splits on their 400 freestyle relay.

6TH: Germany – 7:07.28

Florian Vogel – 1:47.16
Christoph Fildebrandt – 1:47.91
Clemens Rapp – 1:46.12
Paul Biedermann – 1:46.09

The last three teams here were fighting for bragging rights; none of them had any realistic chance of medaling due to either a lack of depth, or lack of a true #1 option.

Things started off a bit rocky with both Florian Vogel and Christoph Fildebrandt well off their lifetime best flat start times, but a brilliant third leg by Clemens Rapp, whose best flat start is 1:47.63, extended their lead over their European rivals.  Paul Biedermann had a disappointing anchor leg, but given Germany was capped at fifth place even if Biedermann set the pool on fire, it’s understandable.

From a purely strategic standpoint, it was surprising to see Biedermann on the end, instead of in the second or third spot.  If he hits the water earlier, Biedermann has a chance to keep the Germans towards the front of the pack, getting some cleaner water and generating more excitement for their quartet and fans.

7TH: Netherlands – 7:09.10

Dion Dreesens – 1:47.58
Maarten Brzoskowski – 1:46.87
Kyle Stolk – 1:47.59
Sebastiaan Vershuren – 1:47.06

Same as above; the Dutch were swimming for pride and national records, not medals.  The first three legs averaged out to be somewhere between “decent” and “solid”; Dion Dreesens was a bit slow, but Maarten Brzoskowski and Kyle Stolk were more than respectable, given their personal bests.  Much like Biedermann for the Germans, Sebastiaan Vershuren anchor left something to be desired, but given where their squad was at that point, we’re not expecting a lifetime best split.

8TH: Belgium – 7:11.64

Louis Croenen – 1:48.95
Dieter Dekoninck – 1:47.50
Glenn Surgeloose – 1:46.91
Pieter Timmers – 1:48.28

Belgium was out of this from the get-go: Louis Croenen had a terrible 1:48.95 opening leg.  With a full second gap over every other team, the relay was working from the back to the pack.  Dieter Dekonink had a nice split, but it wasn’t enough to bring them into the race.  Glenn Surgeloose and Pieter Timmers were essentially competing by themselves.

Fastest splits:

  1. 1:44.14 – Townley Haas – USA
  2. 1:44.85 – James Guy – Great Britain
  3. 1:45.05 – Duncan Scott – Great Britain
  4. 1:45.23 – Conor Dwyer – USA
  5. 1:45.26 – Michael Phelps – USA
  6. 1:45.34 – Kosuke Hagino – Japan
  7. 1:45.37 – Mack Horton – Australia
  8. 1:45.63 – David McKeon – Australia
  9. 1:45.67 – Aleksandr Krasnykh – Russia

In This Story

72
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

72 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alex
7 years ago

I don’t support just allowing guys like Phelps and Lochte to show up and swim the relays without swimming the event in trials. It undermines the point of trials in the first place. Especially Lochte, he hasn’t really looked that spectacular recently. Next time, give the nod to a guy like Conger.

brd92
7 years ago

MP didn’t swim the 1/2 fr at Olympic Trials, saving himself 6 races so that he could focus on the 1/2 fly and 2IM. Everyone else on the relays swam the 1/2 fr at Trials. MP got the benefit of a reduced trials program to maximize his olympic program and while not disputing that he is the greatest and also acknowledging that he did swim well on both 400 and 800 relays, both golds were gifts to him that he did not earn in the same way that the other relay swimmers did at OTs. The US was going to win that 800 free relay no matter what, MP was simply gifted another gold in that one. Regardless, great swims… Read more »

Anthony
7 years ago

Anyone else upset that Phelps was added to the relay? The US was never in danger of losing this race even before it started. Phelps was added to the relay so that he could win another gold medal. I am not happy with the decision. I still remember when Gary Hall, Jr. was taken off the 400 Free Relay in Athens so Phelps could have a spot. It is easy to look at the times after the race and say that Phelps had a good swim, but the US wasn’t going to lose this race, and they were not going to get close to the world record. Embarrassing.

aviatorfly
7 years ago

Ha this Conger-Lochte hindsight is great. Same people said Phelps shouldn’t have been in. How’d that turn out?

Dan
7 years ago

I think it is hilarious that people are still talking about this. Last time I checked Lochte, Phelps, and Conger all received the gold medal. You can make the SPECULATION all you want that Conger could of gone faster and he deserved to be on the relay at night. You don’t know if Conger gave up his spot for Lochte or Phelps or better yet the coaches decided that having Lochte and Phelps in that relay gave them the best chance to win based off their PROVEN TRACK RECORD. It wasn’t a guarantee they were going to win that relay.

People who think that decision was black and white in selecting this relay are dead wrong and have never coached… Read more »

swimdoc
Reply to  Dan
7 years ago

Well said. Conger has a sketchy record overall in coming up big when it counts. He’s usually money on relays (including some extraordinary splits), but he’s never won the close individual races at NCAAs or even World University Games, and has fallen short of even his own expectations in those races. Phelps, on the other hand, has lost one close race in his career when it counts, and Lochte has been money on relays for Worlds and Olympics for over a decade.

Alec
Reply to  swimdoc
7 years ago

Conger has never not showed up on a relay when it counts.

zfibster
Reply to  swimdoc
7 years ago

I love Conger but you’ve got a point. Hopefully Conger goes home, puts his head down, gets on a good nutrition program a la Dwyer, and comes back cut up and unstoppable for the next Olympics…

enchantedrock
Reply to  swimdoc
7 years ago

Sim Doc must apparently doesn’t follow the sport closely.
Conger Relay Swim Sample:
40.9 anchor of the 400 med relay at 2015 nc’s to win it
1:31.8 (5th fast all time) lead off on the 800 free relay this past March
47.8 split at WGU’s

Jace the Ace
Reply to  swimdoc
7 years ago

Spot on Doc! Conger needs to focus on being #1 at UT first before he can claim a spot on a relay against the 2 fastest Americans EVER in the 200 free! I do feel sorry after seeing the 1:46, but tgats why the coaches make the call and not the swimmers. Same thing happened to me at NCAAs

Get him a bodybag
Reply to  Jace the Ace
7 years ago

Early prediction for 2020 is Hass as the gold medal 200 winner & our anchorman. Probably Conger & Max Rooney as locks and Dwyer as the 4th guy veteran who pulls a Phelps/Lochte to make the final team in a close call over a young guy.

Distance Swimmer
7 years ago

Haas American Hero

Dave
7 years ago

Haas drops a 1:44.1, this thread focuses on Phelps, Lochte and Conger. Guys, a semi-obscure (at least to those who don’t follow NCAA swimming) 19 year old just out-split Lochte by almost 2 seconds. That’s fairly noteworthy.

Sidenote, Scott’s 1:45.0 is seriously amazing. Who is that kid?

Dino
Reply to  Dave
7 years ago

I guess this show how people mad about this.

swimdoc
7 years ago

Can the officials in that photo look any less disinterested?

Relay
Reply to  swimdoc
7 years ago

LOL

swimdoc
Reply to  Relay
7 years ago

Channeling their inner Townley Haas.

Joe Bagodonuts
Reply to  swimdoc
7 years ago

Think you mean “less interested” or “more disinterested.”

About Morgan Priestley

Morgan Priestley

A Stanford University and Birmingham, Michigan native, Morgan Priestley started writing for SwimSwam in February 2013 on a whim, and is loving that his tendency to follow and over-analyze swim results can finally be put to good use. Morgan swam competitively for 15+ years, primarily excelling in the mid-distance freestyles. While …

Read More »