Katie Ledecky, In Theoretical Meters, Has Already Been Faster Than the 800 Free World Record

Naturally, after destroying the World Record in the 1500 freestyle on Tuesday, Lotte Friis and Katie Ledecky must have the World Record in the 800 free lined up in their sights next.

The 1500 World Record had sort of a weird feel to it. It was done before the supersuits, it was done at an in-season meet (the Swim Meet of Champions), and nobody had really been all that close to it (Alessia Filippi was a 15:44.93, about two-and-a-half seconds away from it, Friis had been 15:46 in rubber and 15:49 in textile, and Janet Evans was a 15:52 all the way back in 1988).

But the 800, we know is a great record. Rebecca Adlington’s 8:14.10 was unbelievably fast when it was done in 2008. At the time, it was a World Record by two seconds (which we used to think was a large amount by which to break a World Record.

And it doesn’t stand a chance.

After pushing each other to such great heights, Friis and Ledecky will undoubtedly be feeling a little bit of week-long fatigue. Ledecky, you’ll note, has had the 400 already, which Friis has not. Ledecky will also be coming off of the 800 free relay final, which means a late night before the 800 starts.

That’s not a slight against either, but nobody swims a 1500 that fast and pops up fresh the next morning. The good news (for us, bad news for Adlington’s record) is that they get a few days off after their 1500’s.

Regardless, look at the splits. Thanks to our earlier efforts to put the 50-by-50 splits into a spreadsheet, we were able to use some Excel magic to quickly calculate the “fastest” splits for each swimmer by compiling their best 50’s.

Friis Ledecky
Best 100 Meters 58.88 57.61
Best 200 Meters 2:00.39 1:58.80
Best 400 Meters 4:04.60 4:02.92
Best 800 Meters 8:15.47 8:13.88

 

Yes, you read that right. In theoretical meters, Ledecky already broke the 800 World Record by two-tenths of a second.

Other interesting observations about the two’s splits: Ledecky’s best 200 meters were about 1.6 seconds faster than Friis’. That’s basically what made the difference in this race. As anyone who was watching this race could tell, Ledecky didn’t chip away at Friis. It wasn’t two-tenths here, and two-tenths there. Ledecky had about three 50’s that blew Friis away (the last three 50’s to be precise), and the two just slugged at each other the rest of the time.

Goodbye World Record. When this one is broken, there will be no women’s long course World Records left from 2008, and only two men’s.

In This Story

15
Leave a Reply

10 Comment threads
5 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
14 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
chris

this is the swim-nerdiest post ever.
i love it.

Lane Four

Chris, that was the most spot on posting ever for this site…LOL LOL Loved it!

Jeff

You realize that the number for Ledecky was only 0.02 seconds off her record. 8:13:88 via sheet vs actual 8.13.86

Steve Nolan

Ah, yes. Excel magic. (Sort, descend. Or ascending, I always get those confused.)

Lisa

Can’t wait to see her take it down!

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »

Want to take your swimfandom to the next level?

Subscribe to SwimSwam Magazine!