Independent Prosecutor Rules WADA Showed No Bias In Handling of Chinese Doping Case

The independent prosecutor investigating the handling of the Chinese doping case in 2021 found that the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) made an “indisputably reasonable” decision not to challenge the conclusion reached by China’s anti-doping authorities.

Eric Cottier, who was tabbed by WADA to review the case in April, released his findings on Tuesday, ruling that WADA showed no bias toward China in its handling of the case, though there were doubts from WADA’s scientist regarding China’s explanation on how the athletes were contaminated.

In early 2021, 23 Chinese swimmers tested positive for the banned substance trimetazidine (TMZ). The positive tests were not reported at the time, and the swimmers went on to continue competing without any sanctions, including individual Tokyo Olympic champions Wang Shun and Zhang Yufei, and multi-time world champion Qin Haiyang.

Eleven of the swimmers who tested positive are scheduled to compete at the Paris Olympics later this month.

“There is nothing in the file – which is complete – to suggest that WADA showed favoritism or deference, or in any way favored the 23 swimmers who tested positive for trimetazidine (TMZ) between 1 and 3 January 2021, when it proceeded to review CHINADA’s decision to close the proceedings against them without further action,” Cottier said.

Chinese anti-doping authorities (CHINADA) concluded that the athletes had been contaminated with the substance by way of the hotel kitchen where they were staying during a training camp.

Cottier said that WADA made a “reasonable” decision not to challenge CHINADA’s ruling.

“All the elements taken into consideration by WADA, whether they come from the file produced by CHINADA with its decision or from the investigation procedures that it carried out, show the decision not to appeal to be reasonable, both from the point of view of the facts and the applicable rules,” he said.

In an annex published alongside WADA’s press release, Cottier said WADA chief scientist Olivier Rabin was unable to exclude the contamination scenario, facing him with “no other solutions than to accept it, even if he continued to have doubts about the reality of contamination as described by the Chinese authorities.” This is despite Rabin finding it “almost impossible to design a realistic scenario” in determining how the hotel kitchen could’ve been contaminated with TMZ.

In the press release, Rabin said any doubts he had weren’t enough to give WADA a chance at winning an appeal over the Chinese authorities.

“From a scientific point of view, it is important to challenge all aspects of the file to make sure that the explanation of origin of the prohibited substance is a credible one,” Rabin said.

“In this case, despite our skepticism, a thorough review of all the verifiable facts of the case revealed no evidence to challenge the contamination scenario. Rather, all the available evidence pointed towards no-fault contamination versus intentional ingestion. Ultimately, in his report today, the Independent Prosecutor has confirmed that our conclusions were reasonable, based on the evidence.”

• WADA Press Release
• Cottier Interim Report
• Cottier Annex

WADA President Witold Bańka said Cottier’s review confirmed “there was no impropriety connected to WADA’s handling of the case.”

“As the report captures, WADA reviewed this case with a healthy skepticism as it does in all such cases. It was very important that we set the record straight in this regard; and, in particular regarding these two fundamental questions in advance of the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games,” Banka said.

Banka added that WADA will now consider taking legal action against “those that have made untrue and potentially defamatory allegations.”

“These allegations have been extremely damaging to WADA’s reputation and to the confidence and trust that athletes and other stakeholders have in the Agency and in the global anti-doping system,” he said. “Instead of WADA being afforded the opportunity for substantive discussions about procedures based on rules of law and legal provisions, the Agency has been subjected to manipulation and attempts to create the impression that normal cooperation with Chinese stakeholders as the global regulator is somehow proof of bias towards China.”

United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) CEO Travis Tygart has gone back and forth publically with Banka over WADA’s handling of the case, and that continued on Tuesday as Tygart issued a statement casting more doubt on Cottier’s review.

“The WADA report issued by Mr. Cottier today provides athletes and the world with some additional information, but unfortunately, still leaves most of the critical questions unanswered when it comes to WADA allowing China to sweep 23 positive tests for a potent performance-enhancing drug under the carpet,” Tygart said.

“This is unsurprising since WADA itself handpicked the investigator and set the extremely limited scope of the investigation, preventing a meaningful review. Given its cozy role in the creation of the investigation, the world also has to wonder if WADA was able to see and even sanitize the report before its release.”

Tygart outlines how “we still don’t know” how the kitchen was contaminated, what the scientific basis was to determine this was a contamination case, why WADA didn’t open an investigation at the time, why it let China get away with breaking the rules without consequence, and asked, “Were all phone calls and conversations documented such that one can know what role WADA’s vice president, the IOC, and China’s extra funding play in WADA’s decision not to open an investigation or find any consequence on China for failing to follow the mandatory rules?“.

Tygart goes on to thank Cottier for “being able to provide some clarity in some critical places,” and calls on WADA to release the full findings from CHINADA, to submit a compliance audit and to undergo a more thorough investigation.

“From the beginning, our goal has been uncovering the truth and the facts of this situation on behalf of clean athletes,” Tygart said. “Until WADA leadership shares that goal and stops spewing vitriol at any voice of dissent, there will be no trust in the global anti-doping system.

“In fact, today’s WADA rules by fear and intimidation, as their statements make abundantly clear. It’s time for a new strategy given that WADA’s credibility is crumbling before the world’s eyes and athletes deserve openness, transparency, and truth—not more deflection and bullying.”