CIF-SS Proposes New California High School State Championship Meet

According to the agenda for the CIF Southern Section Council meeting held on Thursday evening in Long Beach, California, the California Interscholastic Federation is considering presenting a single state swimming & diving championship in the future.

That’s as compared to now, where the state is divided into 10 sections, each of which has its own championship, which is the end-of-the-line in the country’s deepest and richest state for swimming talent. Beginning in May of 2015, however, that could change.

In April, the CIF Southern Section voted “Support” by a tally of 49-15 to allow one mega-championship that without a doubt would be the biggest and baddest high school meet in the country.

According to Dan Albano of OCVarsity.com, the proposal sees the Southern Section receiving five entries per event, which is the most among the state’s sections.

The Southern Section, which is currently divided into 4 divisions based on enrollment, has been the spark-plug to these changes. The host would be selected in a bidding process, and the State Federated Council will vote to finalize the measure at their meeting in February.

The CIF SS has long pushed toward creating a single, bigger meet. Until 2012, they held a “Masters” meet combining all four of their divisions. That, though, was largely an unpopular meet among club coaches, as it pushed the California High School season even later into the long course season, when California already has one of the latest High School championships in the country.

Though this new meet would create a spectacular spectacle, criticisms are that with the level of depth in California, there would be potential Division 1-caliber swimmers that wouldn’t even earn an invite to the championship, which could discourage them from joining. This could hurt the positive growth that high school swimming and California has seen recently, including a 2.8% uptick in boys’ swimming from 2012-2013. That’s the biggest growth that any California boys sport saw other than softball, field hockey, and water polo (noting that the former two are small numbers – softball grew from 107 to 226 participants, and field hockey from 67 to 195).

17
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

17 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
10 years ago

PAC12BACKER I wholeheartedly agree with you. At the CA-NV Sectional Meet both Northern and Southern CA swimmers chide each other all the time as to who has the faster swimmers. That’s what makes this sport fun. Why wait till 2015. Let’s get it going for 2014!!

Richard Henderson
10 years ago

California is an enormous state. I’m assuming a rotation would need to be established for location. There will be significant cost for the sections farthest away from the meet site. If you have finals and console, all-american athletes will not get 2nd swims in many events. I think someone is trying to fix something that is not broken and in fact is exemplary.

PAC12BACKER
Reply to  Richard Henderson
10 years ago

Yeah, I agree. The system is already very good. However, there is always a vocal contingent that wants to see the match-ups of the really good Northern CA swimmers versus the Southern CA swimmers. Last year it was people who wanted the Kyle Gornay matchup versus Sven Campbell and a couple others. Every year there is always that “what if” matchup scenario.

But one of the best head to head match-ups of all time did occur within the CA-Southern Section when Joey Hale out touched Karl Krug for the 50 free title in 2008, both sub 20. No other section could have touched that.

JJD
Reply to  PAC12BACKER
10 years ago

Yeah, 3 swimmers breaking the previous national record in the 100 breast at the 2013 NCS meet doesn’t come close to 2 guys going sub 20 in the fifty free.

SwimFan
10 years ago

If this would replace the current SS CIF meet, then I think you would lose a lot of swimmers who may qualify for CIF, but wouldn’t have a chance of qualifying for the State meet. Instead of swimming for their high school teams, they would just swim for their club. SS CIF Finals are a big draw for the very good, but not elite swimmers.

Swim mom
Reply to  SwimFan
10 years ago

I agree with swim fan. If you have just one big meet, just the elite will get to go and will cut out a lot of the very good swimmers who normally qualify for the current SS CIF meets.

PAC12BACKER
10 years ago

The CIF Southern Section (CIF-SS) currently comprises a huge geographic area, much of it high density populated, with approx 330 high schools. Just this section alone puts it on par with the Indiana high school state meet.

GH
10 years ago

I think one meet would be awesome but in order for it to work in a state as big as California would be to use qualifying standards. Kids could achieve the cut early in the season and then taper solely for the state meet which then really would be the fastest highschool meet. Winning that state championship would really mean something as you wouldn’t be 1 of 10 state champions in California that year but the only and true state champion.

ole 99
10 years ago

How would selection be run? Each section gets a certain number of spots per event, with unequal weighting of spots amongst the sections? Not being from CA or knowing anything about how the sections are set up, that seems rather unfair. It’s just one person’s opinion here, but I’d rather see all the sections have the same guarantee of a few spots (say 3) with a time standard or cumulative sectional time ranking allowing for additional swimmers to qualify. I also wouldn’t allow the use of presectional times for qualification. You have to perform the time at a sectional meet.

PAC12BACKER
Reply to  ole 99
10 years ago

There are only 3 large sections with CIF-SS being the largest with 330 high schools. There are a couple sections that are very small, one sectrion is just inner city LA with heavily minority, socio-economic disadvantaged communities. The times in that secton have never been competitive relative to the premier sections, Like CIF-SS

sam
Reply to  PAC12BACKER
10 years ago

City of Los Angeles has its own Section because it has over 700,000 students. It has over 50 high schools with swim teams. City of LA stretches from Malibu to San Pedro. There are about 7 leagues. Each league has its own championship. The top 24 times from the championships advance to the City semi-finals. From the semi-finals, the top 12 advance to the finals. These athletes constantly have to hear about how lame their division is compared to the other sections. If these athletes do well in their division, there are always those who want to remind them that they wouldn’t do well in another division.

In 2009, Andi Murez swam for Venice High School and at the CIF… Read more »

TJ
10 years ago

Would this be replacing the CIF meets, or would the sectioned CIF meets still stand as the selection meet for the state championships? Because in order to qualify for CIF (at least in Div 1) most swimmers have to taper for their smaller league championships. If this went through swimmers would potentially have to taper for three meets in a row.

ole 99
Reply to  TJ
10 years ago

For those of us not in CA, how does qualification for the sectional championships work now… time standards? (seasonal or at a league championship?), place at league championship? etc? I agree asking kids to hold a taper for 3 weeks is too much

socalswim
Reply to  ole 99
10 years ago

right now its the top 36 swimmers that make it for each respective division. there is A cut and B cut standards similar to NCAAs. the top talent is spread out among 4 divisions and this is just southern california. with all the talent in central and northern california as well this would hands down be the fastest high school meet in the country if they could get this to happen.

NorCalMom
Reply to  ole 99
10 years ago

For CCS (Central Coast Section – Nor-CA), to qualify for the meet, there are qualifying times. 2014’s times can be found here: http://www.cifccs.org/playoffs/swimming,%20new.html & click on the link “2014 Swimming & Diving Bylaws.” The times are based on the (3) three year average of the 40th place time at the meet for individual events, and the 32nd time for relays. Here are the results from 2013’s meet: http://www.cifccs.org/playoffs/swimming,%20new.html

CCS encompasses the territory north to San Francisco all the way south to Carmel. As mapped by Google Maps, is a territory of 122 miles, through a densely populated area with many schools.

Most of the section meets in CA… Read more »

Reply to  TJ
10 years ago

I would disagree in that most of your D1swimmers who would be fast enough to qualify for a state meet do not taper for their league finals. They save it for CIF, as most get their cuts before league.

Caliswimmr
10 years ago

The concept of a huge “mega-meet” is intriguing. Will allow the country to see the top-end speed and depth of California swimming.

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »